The Rum Diary {Film Review}

The film has had a long developing process and delays that caused some concern whether this film will see the light of day (just like Thompson wrote the book in 1961 but never got published till 1998).

The first time Johnny Depp delved into the mind of Hunter S. Thompson was back in 1998 which he starred in a film called, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. The film was directed by Terry Gilliam, known for his bizarre and surrealist work with Time Bandits, Twelve Monkeys and Brazil. It centered on two characters; Raoul Duke (Depp, impersonating the embodiment of Thompson) and his attorney, Dr. Gonzo (Benicio del Toro). They travel to Las Vegas to pursue the American dream but with some drug inducing results. It was a box-office failure, but slowly got a cult following. Thompson’s other autobiographical book, The Rum Diary, had been pursued by Hollywood since 2000. Going through different distributors, filmmakers and film stars (Thompson calling the whole long process a “waterhead fuckaround”). Eventually Thompson committed suicide in 2005 and Depp got financial backing along with Graham King (Oscar winning British producer of The Departed). Bruce Robinson joined in to adapt and direct the film. The film’s production lasted a year in Puerto Rico, Mexico and post-production took two years to complete. So the result is actually much better than one may expect but it isn’t entirely without faults.

Depp plays Paul Kemp, an American journalist who moves to Puerto Rico to work at The San Juan Star (comes in a day late for his interview). He then meets various interesting individuals; Bob Sala (Michael Rispoli), the news photographer. Moberg (Giovanni Ribisi), a political correspondent who likes to listen to Hitler’s speech and brings over 400% proof alcohol. Then there’s Sanderson (Aaron Eckhart), a shady business man and his girlfriend, Chenault (Amber Heard). Depp gets involved on being part of Sanderson’s scheme on writing about his future development in Puerto Rico but also gets entangled with Chenault and things start to get bizarre.

The screenplay by Robinson is very witty and quite funny, the actors play their parts very well. Although Depp seems a bit miscast, as the character should be played by a younger actor (Thompson was 22 during the time he worked in Puerto Rico). though the story is where it falters. It starts off really well, introducing our character straight in from waking up an event that we only see the aftermath and then seeing the political stress of 1960s Mexico. Kemp then arriving for his interview, learning afterward he was the only applicant. Then the story at the second act goes a bit inconsistent, having a sub-plot between Kemp and Sanderson and a romance sub-plot that doesn’t feel developed. It all seems tacked on and out of place, though some argue that’s probably the point and all to do with Thompson’s unstructured psyche. Especially when he hangs out mostly with Bob, getting chased by locals and Kemp using Moberg’s alcohol as a flamethrower to defend themselves.

The cinematography is very nicely shot, seeing the different scenery of the setting and using high vibrant colours. The score is quite subtle, using jazz and orchestral music with the different tones and emotions going through the story.

Overall; not a complete waste of time but was unfortunately not up the league of comedy genius compared to Withnail & I. Thompson’s memory should’ve been blazing, but sadly only with a flicker.

3 out of 5

TinTin Review

TinTin is a must-see film. Although the Guardian gave it a poor review, for which they have rightly now been castigated, I cannot find anyone else who agrees with them. TinTin is already famous, so it was brave of Steven Spielberg to make a film on a childhood classic. He does not disappoint.

Although 3D is not a new thing, it has become the gimmick of the moment. While waiting for the film to start, it seemed that every film made in the last 10 years had a trailer announcing they would be in the cinema soon in ‘full 3D’. This is not a complaint, only an observation. I saw TinTin in 3D and definitely think it was worth donning the specs. Not every film needs to be in 3D, but some of the scenes, without giving anything away, really worked.

Spielberg is a master storyteller. He makes the kind of films the cinema experience was made for and TinTin is no exception of his talents. A rip-roaring, entertaining film. Spectacular animation, some of the best you have ever seen, and technically incredible. The voice acting was amazing and the characters were brought to life wonderfully. Though what do you expect from a film which is not only directed by Steven Spielberg, but also has Peter Jackson on the second unit?

My only complaint is the film is a PG, so you might be in the cinema with some badly behaved children whose parents won’t tell them to be quiet.

Five stars. Loved it.

Angelina Jolie's Directorial Debut, Trailer Released.

If there was an award for over-achieving Angelina Jolie would definitely win it, an Oscar winning actor, six children, Brad Pitt on her arm, and an activist.

Layed up with flu for a few days and quarantined from her children, she banged out the script for ‘In the Land of Blood and Honey’, her directorial debut. A women of substance, Jolie’s debut is a political film about the war in Bosnia. It looks amazing, and we can’t wait to see it. Check it out below.

In the Land of Blood and Honey opens on Dec. 23.

The Thing (2011) {Film Review}

*WARNING: MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS!*

As normal tradition with every year from the film industry, we’re treated to an unnecessary horror remake that didn’t need to be remade in the first place (I’m looking at you Michael Bay and your production company, Platinum Dunes!). So it would’ve been sooner or later that John Carpenter’s 1982 cult-classic, The Thing, would be up for grabs! The film was a remake to The Thing From Another World (1951), which itself was an adaptation of the 1938 short story, Who Goes There?. 2011’s The Thing, is a prequel set before the events of the 1982 film and shows us exactly what happened at the Norwegian base in Antarctica. Though the idea of seeing the events unfold isn’t something fans were desperately demanding to see and we can already establish what will happen without having to guess. So it comes to great shame that this version of The Thing is nothing more than a continuation of the unnecessary horror remake/prequel line.

The film starts out three members of the Norwegian team discovering the alien spaceship that was featured briefly in the first film. Then they recruit an American paleontologist, Kate Lloyd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), ask her to come to the alien crash site in Antarctica and to study the specimen they also discovered. They bring back the frozen alien life form back to the base, though it eventually escapes. Causing chaos and destruction, whilst Kate finds out the creature can imitate other beings (in this case, other people) and therefore one of their team members could potentially be the alien.

The film obviously shows the filmmakers does not understand what made the original movie brilliant; it wasn’t about the monster but the horror was atmospheric. The pacing was slow but that’s what brought the suspense and tension, making you play detective on guessing who’s not human and who is. This film is more interested on killing each human character we barely got to know as quickly as possible, leaving our two heroes; Kate Lloyd, who is just a rip-off of Ellen Ripley from the Alien series. Braxton “Sam” Carter (played by Joel Edgerton) is a carbon copy of R.J. MacReady (played famously by Kurt Russell) but less charismatic and interesting. The characters in the first film had individual traits, which made them identifiable and somewhat likable that made you care what happens to them. The characters in this film get barely anything to work with and you could care less which one gets infected and dies.

The story is an exact copy of the original film, done maybe in different order but essentially a remake by the word. It also features quite a few plot-holes and stupid decisions from the filmmakers; if the ship worked all this time, why didn’t the alien just go and leave? If there was a Russian base mentioned at the end of the film, why didn’t the American base know about it in the original film? The film was written by Eric Heisserer, who also co-wrote the equally unnecessary horror remake, A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010). This is Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.’s feature film debut, as he only previously made a video and a short film (according to his IMDb page). He resorts to the horror clichés on having jump scares, mistaking it for creating scares when it doesn’t (and it gets really tiresome very quickly). The suspense and paranoia that was featured in the original is gone and it is just simply a generic monster film where it is survival for the fittest.

The visual effects in this film look terrible, and this is over reliance on CGI. The effects in the original film, done by legendary make-up maestro Rob Bottin, are much more affective because they’re practical and are more believable than seeing monsters done by computers. Though worst of all, seeing more of the creature is hard to suspend your disbelief and makes it less scary. The creature in the original was only shown with close-ups and viewed with other uses of lighting (flares, flash-lights etc.) It was more a creature to hide, never to attack full on. Another thing that this remake/prequel fails to attempt that the original succeeded.

Overall; as I keep mentioning through-out this review, John Carpenter’s 1982 masterpiece is, and will always be, the best! It is far more scary and is done with a lot more care. As Carpenter once said to Empire magazine in 1997; “You’ll never, ever, see anything like The Thing again.” Looks like it will be a long while till we do!

2 out of 5

Frost Interviews Film Director Peter Chipping

Frost: Did you always want to be a director?

PC: I guess so – although I started as an editor & that seemed a great role, like finishing a jigsaw puzzle from a large pile of disparate elements, many of which don’t seem to join together. Then I realised I’d like to create those disparate elements myself, but not make them quite as disparate.

How did you get your start in the business?

I started in theatre & Yvonne Arnaud in Guildford, before enrolling at Ravensbourne for a new TV course, them got my first job at Central TV in Birmingham.

What was your big break?

Editing Crossroads.

What is your favourite thing about working in film?

Teamwork: No matter what ideas I get, there’s always other people who can add to them & make them better.

And the least?

The gaps between projects.

What are you working on at the moment?

Three short interlocked comedies, two 60 minute broadcast documentaries and a feature paranormal thriller.

What is your favourite film?

The Conversation.

What mistakes do actors make at auditions?

Not show the range of emotions that is available in their arsenal.

What projects are you hoping to get off the ground?

A feature paranormal thriller.

Favourite actress?

Michelle Pfeiffer in The Fabulous Baker Boys.

Thanks Peter.

The Hamptons International Film Festival

Now entering its 19th year, The Hamptons International Film Festival was
founded to celebrate independent film, and to introduce a unique and varied
spectrum of international films and filmmakers to its audiences. Set for
October 13-17, the festival is committed to exhibiting films that express
fresh voices and differing global perspectives, aiming to enlighten
audiences, provide invaluable exposure for filmmakers and present inspired
entertainment for all.

For this year’s festival, T&F was responsible for the design and production
of promo spots which began airing widely last week. T&F also did a
tremendous amount of editorial work on its original live-action content —
and audio, leveraging original music and sound designs donated by Copilot.

Here’s the link to see the :15 promo: <http://vimeo.com/29840585>
http://vimeo.com/29840585

“The Hamptons International Film Festival has been going strong for many
years, and for good reason,” T&F partner and director Scott Matz says.
“Though we had a relatively clean slate to build upon, we were tasked with
remaining loyal to the brand equity of the HIFF established last year by
Greenfield & Co. We originally pitched a great deal of creative. Some was
driven by graphic animation and some by live-action storytelling. Our team
ultimately landed on a mix of both for the festival.

“Our team continues to be incredibly passionate about what we do and is
growing in inspiring ways,” Scott adds. “Our work for the HIFF is yet
another testament to the fact that we never compromise great creative
vision, and we firmly believe in only the highest production value.”

For more information, please visit http://hamptonsfilmfest.org.

Midnight in Paris – Review

It’s hard to go into a film fresh, viewing it as a single work, as opposed to comparing it to similar films or previous films from the creator. Especially when it comes to Woody Allen.

 

He is a writer/director who has had, in many critics’ eyes, a very specific golden age. There’s been many calls of a ‘return to form’, but these are often followed up by huge flops.

 

Sweet and Lowdown was followed by Small Time Crooks, Match Point by Scoop and Casandra’s Dream, Vicky Cristina Barcelona by Whatever Works.

 

Everyone wants to see him hit his heights again, and so are constantly comparing his recent output to early greats like Annie Hall and Manhattan. However, this is unfair to Allen, and it’s a point he makes well in his most recent ‘return to form’.

 

While many could see Midnight in Paris as a love letter to a bygone era, it can also been seen as a dig at critics who are always looking for something greater in the past.

 

After all, it’s about a screenwriter who has been successful in the Hollywood system but who is trying to break out in writing something real, a true work of art, his great American novel.

 

Allen has been doing this his whole career – yet he’s been trapped by mainstream success. Even in Annie Hall, Alfie suffered a similar problem.

 

Like the critics who endlessly long for the days of Hannah and her Sisters, Owen Wilson’s Gil longs for Paris in the 1920’s. And, through one of the most simple time travel devices ever, he manages to find it.

 

Hemingway, the Fitzgerald’s, Dali, Picasso and many more all happen to be holidays in Paris and Gil takes a tour of his dream world with the greatest hosts he could imagine. However, it’s when he meets Marion Cotillard’s ‘art groupy’ that things start to get real for him.

 

Not only does she highlight the problems he’s facing with his soon-to-be wife in the real world, she, too, also longs for a different era, declaring Paris in the 20’s to be boring.

 

As a movie, it’s the most fun Allen has been in a while. While not really touching upon some of the bigger issues Allen has handled in the past, it doesn’t matter as its so funny, charming, and beautifully shot.

The Avengers (2012) trailer

There hasn’t been a movie so massive in anticipation and scale since The Dark Knight back in 2008. Now Marvel has completed on introducing our main characters; Captain America, Iron Man and Thor, it’s time for the inevitable team-up that has been teasing us with each end-credits scene. On October 11th, we finally get an official teaser trailer of The Avengers.

The trailer shows us that Tom Hiddleston’s Loki will be the film’s main antagonist, but his motives are unclear (world domination or simply causing chaos?). We also get a glimpse of Captain America’s and Thor’s new costume change (not to mention Thor’s hair extension). Each giving witty comebacks, such as Steve Rogers saying;

Steve Rogers: Big man in a suit of armour. Take that away, what are you?
Tony Stark: Er a genius, billionaire playboy and philanthropist.

This is all to be expected from writer/director Joss Whedon, whose previous works are Angel, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Firefly (we’ll just ignore he wrote Alien Resurrection).

From the look of this teaser, it really does show Loki to be more an intimidating villain than he was in Thor. Then we also get to see Jeremy Renner as Hawkeye in action and can’t not have shots of Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow doing what she knows best. Although we see both Captain America and Thor battling it out in a forest?

It gives a sigh of relief that Joss Whedon does know what he’s doing and does seem to deliver the spectacle but also great characterisation. Though he’s got some strong competition against Christopher Nolan and Warner Bros./DC Comics with The Dark Knight Rises. All will be revealed when the film is released on 4th May, 2012.

Official website; http://marvel.com/movies/movie/152/marvels_the_avengers?fullscreen=1

The Avengers teaser trailer on Apple iTunes; http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/marvel/avengers/