Film Reviews: Kick Ass

Kick-Ass (2010) ***** (5 out of 5)

Based on a comic series by Scottish comic book writer, Mark Millar. The simple premise is what if an average joe decided to become a superhero? The result is a hilarious black comedy with character depth and a truly unique superhero movie.
Aaron Johnson plays the movie’s protagonist, Dave Lizewski. He’s your typical geek who’s into comic books and (figuratively) invisible to girls or anyone on that matter. There have been added characteristics that wasn’t featured in the source material, but it works and makes his character. The voice-over by Johnson isn’t entirely needed, but it’s enthusiastic enough to make it a minor criticism. Mark Strong plays Frank D’Amico, a New York gangster who suddenly has a superhero problem and decides to take matters to his own hands. He plays him with such menace that is brooding but also charismatic that could’ve came out from Goodfellas. The two scene stealers are Chloe Moretz as Hit-Girl and Nicolas Cage as Big Daddy. Chloe delivers her lines as she was born for this role, but gives a gentle warm feeling that doesn’t come out disturbing. Controversial that she’s given a line many parents will, most likely, complain about (“Okay, you c****. Lets see what you can do now!”) but it comes off hilarious and even then even more darkly hysterical when she starts killing off the drug dealers and the Banana Splits theme tune kicks in. Nicolas Cage plays Hit-Girl’s father, a ex-cop who also dons a costume that looks similar to Batman. What makes his performance stand out is his uncanny impersonation of Adam West from the 60s Batman TV-series. It just reminds us how crazy but damn good Cage can be and it’s about time Matthew Vaughn showed us that. Christopher Mintz-Plasse as Chris D’Amico/Red Mist reminded me of his McLovin act but also stayed true to the character.
The screenplay by Jane Goldman and director Matthew Vaughn is superb, delivering witty lines and spot on comic timing. This movie isn’t afraid to acknowledge its comic book roots, bringing satire, clichés and homages that make it its own. There’s even a reference to Taxi Driver, which also dealt with vigilantism. It makes sure there’s a fine line between glorifying the violence, and resulting it being negative. Kick-Ass may feature young teenagers killing people, but A) the people that are getting killed are bad guys, so therefore doesn’t make it controversial or morally wrong and B) the heroes don’t fight their way out and get away with it. They too get punished for their actions. Especially when Dave narrates by saying “with no power, comes no responsibility”, and then later realises he will be responsible to what he does. It brings a significant cultural relevance to the YouTube/Facebook/Myspace era, which was used in the original comic book series but it’s executed better in the film. The music fits so well, that it feels exciting and thrilling to watch the action sequences. I also applaud to the choreography and editing, the pacing is set just right and the fight scenes are shot and cut for the viewer to be able to see what’s going on (Michael Bay, take notes).
Overall; maybe not a classic at first glance but it will definitely launch a new set of fans. It’s certainly a must-see movie of 2010 and one of the top best so far. Matthew Vaughn understands the superhero movie aesthetics and conventions, but turns it around to make it stand-alone. It’s Fight Club meets Spider-Man, but also a hint of Watchmen.
Owun Birkett

Sex and the City 2

The run up to Sex and the City 2 was like Christmas for me. I counted down the days. As someone who has seen every episode and the first film it was not hard for me to be pleased. I watched the TV series when I was far too young to be affected by the issues. I guess I still am. This never mattered. They were like older sisters who lived an impossibly, grown up life. Sure they were designer obsessed and flawed. All sisters are. I loved them anyway. So, did it let me down

No. Liza Minnelli doing Beyonce was worth the price of the ticket alone. The cloths are just as amazing, the dialogue as sharp ( Carrie’s retort to the point that leaving your husband with a hot nanny should be against the law; the Jude Law ) the characters are as flawed and interesting as ever.

While Mr Big comes across as a a bit of a jerk, Aidan making a welcome return to the scene, giving you plenty of eye candy. Along with Jerrod Smith and a host of other men. For all of the critics that say it is shallow some of the scenes are truly emotionally beautiful and real. Charlotte locking herself in the cupboard to get a break from her children and crying, The look Aidan gives Carrie that tells you that he still loves her – that she broke his heart. Carrie looking back at her single days; telling Charlotte that she was a headless chicken, running around, just trying to get the man she loved to love her back. Who can’t relate to that?

The film has been accused of racism. I believe that was never the intention. It can come across as slightly dis-respectable. But I wasn’t disappointed. The film is what it is. Go see it. It’s still fun, fabulous and relevant.

Director Interview – Adam Simcox [Film]

Our emerging-talent-philes warned us about a director who was winning awards on the festival circuit so we cornered him to tell us all about his latest project. Here is what he said…

Frost: Tell me about the film…

Adam: Rock and Roll Stole my Soul is a fictional documentary about a rock band called the Fury.  It charts their almost rise to fame, and the bitterness and loss that comes with the failure of a band, or, indeed anyone, to make it in the music industry.

But, you know.  There’s jokes in there too.

Frost: What was your inspiration for making it?

Adam: I’ve been massively into music since the age of 5, and always dreamed about being the lead singer in a rock and roll band.  Or a guitarist.  To be honest, I’d have settled for bassist.  For a while, it looked like it might happen; the only thing really holding me back was a complete and utter lack of any musical ability whatsoever.  Plus, I couldn’t sing/didn’t have the requisite charisma/access to illegal pharmaceuticals.  Rock and Roll Stole my Soul is basically me living out my rock star fantasies, which is one of the reasons it was so much fun to make.

Frost:  What exactly is the film nominated for?

Adam: It picked up a best film nomination at the Twin Rivers Media Festival in North Carolina, and has just been selected for the AOF Festival in Pasadena.  That’s a biggie, as it was voted one of the 25 best by Moviemaker magazine, and is renowned for helping break new talent.  They announce the award nominees at the start of July, so I’m keeping everything that’s vaguely crossable crossed.

Frost: What was your biggest challenge you faced while you were making it?

Adam: The biggest challenge, and believe me, it’s a damn good challenge to face, is what to leave out.  I could have made another film with the material and actors I had to cut out completely.  I shot the film in two ways: there was a shooting script, which I captured, and then each scene would be acted out again, but this time completely improvised.  Because the format is a documentary one, and because it’s important for each performance to be as truthful as possible, all the auditions which were held were improvisational in format.  There are performances in this film that it just wasn’t possible to include, for reasons of story or running time.  It was a dream cast to work with.

Frost:  Is there anything you would have done differently if you did it again?

Adam: I shot this film on a rolling basis, over a period of 9 months, which was great, as it allowed me to go back and fix what wasn’t working, story wise.  For the first time, when it was finished and burning to DVD, I had the pleasant feeling of finishing a project that was almost exactly how I originally pictured it.  Visually, it’s not perfect – if I was to start shooting it again today parts of it would certainly look better – but overall I told the story I wanted to tell, in the manner I wanted to tell it.

Frost: Do you see yourself as a typical ‘auteur’?

Adam: I’m always wary of the term ‘auteur’, as it suggests a beret wearing, pretentious ****.  Now, while this is in fact a completely accurate description of me, I’d still rather consider myself as multi skilled media maverick.

The lesson I learnt from my first film, The Superhero, was that I needed a greater degree of self-sufficiency.  It’s not enough to just classify yourself as a writer/director nowadays.  If you’re working on a limited budget (and who isn’t?) it’s vital that you can do as many of the roles yourself as is physically possible.  On Superhero, because there was animation and a great deal of effects work, too much emphasis was put on other people.  With this film, I tried to make it as simple as possible, and adopted a back to basics approach, teaching myself editing, sound design and camera along the way.  This has led to me doing video work with several theatre companies this year.  I’m always up for collaborating with a project that seems like it’s going to be exciting.

Frost: What’s next in the pipeline?

Adam: I’ve made a bit of headway into the music video world this year.  I’m just finishing one for a Mexican artist called Mig Dfoe which I think is going to turn out really well.  It’s a great tune, and is out next month, I believe, on Loki Records.  I’ve also just finished shooting and editing a short film with Kirsty Eyre, who I know from the theatre world.  I can’t say too much about that one yet, but it’s unique, it’s called The Lonely Gladiator, and it could be a bit of a festival killer, I think.

Frost: Where can festival goers see your film being screened?

Adam: Any of you good people that are in the LA/Pasadena area, get yourselves to the AOF Festival in Pasadena from July 23rd onwards, snap up a ticket for the screening, and have your soul stolen by Rock and Roll*.

*Film not actually guaranteed to steal your soul, more just borrow it for 70 minutes

Retro Film Reviews: Ferris Bueller's Day Off

Ladies and gentlemen, you are such a wonderful crowd, I’d like to
describe a little film for you. It’s one of my personal favorites and
I’d like to dedicate it to a young man who doesn’t think there’s
anything good about it.

Ferris Bueller’s Day Off is the fourth and finest of the John
Huges-directed teen comedies. Like its predecessors, the film is set
in the environs of a Midwestern high-school with an ensemble cast of
geeks, freaks and prom-queens; unlike its predecessors, Ferris takes a
less earnestly melodramatic and more worldly view, widening its scope
of reference from classrooms and hallways to the world beyond. The
film is less obsessed with the high-school caste system than Sixteen
Candles (and the Hughes-penned Pretty in Pink), less sentimental than
Breakfast Club, and less peurile than Weird Science. In its more adult
take on the teenage world, Ferris is also far funnier than any of the
earlier films.

Where Hughes’ earlier films were narrowly focussed on the cliques and
codes of early mid-teen life, Ferris examines the hopes and fears of
three friends (not a clique, but a genuine friendship group) about to
leave for college and, beyond that, adulthood. Where the concerns of
Hughes’ younger teenage characters in earlier films – popularity, peer
acceptance and a prom date – seem superficial and transient to adult
viewers now, the characters in Ferris worry about finding a role in
life and maintaining relationships over distance and time, far more
universal concerns that still resonate with this viewer.

Ferris the character is neither hero nor true antihero. He’s not a
jock, he’s not a brain, he’s not president of the drama society. He’s
a minor rebel, characterised by his principal as having an attitude
problem, but not a loner or an outcast – news of Ferris’s illness
(exaggerated by Chinese whispers throughout the course of the movie)
leads to horror throughout the student body, among whom he is
well-liked. He’s handy with a computer (although emphatically not a
nerd, contrasting him with Weird Science’s friendless-geek leads), and
clearly bright but wasting his potential. In other words, he’s an
average cocky 18-year-old Western male slacker, courting the attention
of his peers without being mature enough to realise his impending
responsibilities, the kind of character Bart Simpson would grow into
if he ever graduated grade school.

Ferris’s immature rebellion is not without aspiration, however –
school principal Roooney (the marvellous Jeffrey Jones), attempting to
track down the truants, goes to all the places in town he believes a
teenager would want to hang out – fast food diners and grungy
amusement arcades. Instead, the trio of Ferris, best friend Cameron
and cheerleader girlfriend Sloane “borrow” Cameron’s father’s 1961
Ferrari 250 GT California and drive to Chicago for a day of fine
dining, fine art, live sports and adventures with a street parade.
Rooney’s underestimation of Ferris’s aspirations gets him into scrapes
and costs him his quarry.

As well as its young-adult (rather than mid-teen) outlook and
extra-school Chicago setting, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off differs from
earlier Hughes outings in having a more playful relationship with the
viewer. Where The Breakfast Club’s characters stayed firmly within
their allocated spaces on screen, Ferris frequently breaks the fourth
wall to banter with the audience. One of the reasons we accept his
desire for a day off with sympathy is not just because he drives a
Ferrari and it looks cool, but because he takes us into his world,
sharing tips (“the key to faking out the parents is the clammy hands”)
and confiding in us the hopes and fears (“Sloane’s this bigger
problem”) that temper his front of cocky self-assurance. Hughes does
play with fourth-wall breaking in other movies, but typically in his
adult-led films (such as National Lampoon) rather than his teen
rite-de-passage items.

In addressing the viewer directly, Ferris also gives us access to the
fantasy that is his day off. “If you had access to a car like this,”
he asks us, “would you take it back right away? …Neither would I.”
We sympathise with Ferris because he does what we want to do. There’s
the Ferrari, of course (man, that car is beautiful), but there’s also
the audacious kidnap of Sloane from the school, his dealings with a
snooty (snooty?) snotty (snotty!) maitre d’, the jumping onstage to
sing “Twist and Shout” with a Bavarian band, the viewing a gallery
full of priceless artworks while The Dream Academy play a cover of
“Please, Please, Please Let Me Get What I Want”. (OK, that last one is
maybe a thing we all could do tomorrow, I just wanted to drop my
favourite fact in somewhere). All of the above might look like the
antics of a self-satisfied little twerp if it weren’t for the
invitation to be part of the action.

And plus, the fourth-wall breaking business not only lets us inside
the head of a frustrated Midwestern teen forced to go through the
nonsense of a standard US education (Ben Stein’s scene really is
fantastic on this), but it gives us some great lines to enjoy into the
bargain. I can’t resist: “I mean, really, what’s the point? I’m not
European. I don’t plan on being European. So who gives a crap if
they’re socialists? They could be fascist anarchists, it still doesn’t
change the fact that I don’t own a car.”

In fact, Ferris is the film that has made the second-greatest impact
on my everyday vocabulary after Heathers. I mainly quote Jeannie – “Do
you know anything”, “Speaka da ENGLISH???” and “Go piss up a flagpole”
are personal favourites. I think Jennifer Grey gives a great
performance here, and it’s a much more fun character than that
mealy-mouthed Baby in Dirty Dancing. The neurotic Cameron is the
perfect foil for always-together Ferris, and is convincing both as a
character and as a loyal best friend – each supplies what the other
lacks.

Principal Rooney, as the authoritarian nemesis, can also be seen as
the yin to Ferris’s yang – he fears and perhaps secretly envies the
way Ferris appears to have control over the student body, the way he
himself would like to. “Last thing I need at this point in my career
is fifteen hundred Ferris Bueller disciples running around these
halls,” says Rooney. “He jeopardizes my ability to effectively govern
this student body.” Rooney’s secretary Grace helfpully spells out the
problem: “Well, makes you look like an ass is what he does, Ed.”

Really, though, that soul of the film lies in Matthew Broderick’s
fantastic central performance. The man may have taken over Broadway
since 1986 and won Tony Awards and whatnot, but he’ll be remembered by
a generation as the slightly spoiled, slightly rebellious,
slightly-cooler-than-the-rest-of-the-class-but-not-to-the-point-of-implausibility
graduating senior, and that comes down to a great interpretation of a
mature and well-written role.

Ferris Bueller’s Day Off is often billed as a teen comedy or a slice
of 80s nostalgia. With Sigue Sigue Sputnik on the soundtrack, it
certainly is the latter, and it admittedly is a comedy with teens in
it; but I also think it’s not limited to a teenage audience or to a
teenage worldview. It’s about friendship, love, and what you want to
do in life, and those are concerns not limited to the Reagan era or
the end of high-school. The film is populated by authentic characters
rather than stereotypes, dusted with musings on the nature of
existence without toppling into the melodramatic, scripted with
genuine warmth and acted by a great cast. But most importantly of all,
it is simply very funny.

By Lise Smith

Film Review: Robin Hood (2010)

Frost Rating ****

There have been many interpretations of the legendary man himself. Popularly first known by Errol Flynn in The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) and then the Kevin Costner version, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991). I’ve only seen the latter, it was all good fun and one of the few films I watched mostly as a kid. I loved the idea of a man standing up corruption and just being an old fashioned swash-buckling adventure. Although Kevin Costner was miscast as the English rebel, only reason for being cast was his big heyday back in the early 90s and winning awards for Dances With Wolves. The only plus side was having a scene-stealing Alan Rickman as the Sheriff of Nottingham. It has been nearly 20 years since, and Ridley Scott/Russell Crowe have now brought us their version of the story.

We’ve seen the tale of Robin Hood been done to death and it’s actually a sigh of relief to see something fresh to an otherwise adventurous story. Another point to make that it’s more a revisionist take, than a remake or reboot. As many have mentioned, this is a prequel than the typical Robin Hood story we all know. Stealing from the rich and giving to the poor is explained, rather than making it a basis of the film. It shows how Robin Hood (known through-out as Robin Longstride) becomes the man we all know and love. It may be not needed, but Ridley Scott pulls it off rather well. Robin is a soldier for the crusades under the rule of King Richard (Danny Huston, a brief but wonderfully played role), and returns back to England from his long fight in France after Richard dies. He comes back finding the country in a total mess, now Prince John (Oscar Isaac) is pronounced King and starts making an example to his rule by using threats to make the whole of England pay the kings taxes. Robin returns a sword to Walter Loxley (Max Von Sydow) as a promise from his dead son, which his wife happens to be Marion (Cate Blanchett). The theme of the story is self-discovery, although it slightly acts as a bit expositional but it doesn’t linger on to make it that much a critique. Meanwhile, the sub-plot is with France preparing to invade England.

Slightly distracts us from the story of Robin and Marion, but it unravels an exciting climactic battle sequence and the reason King John declares out leading hero to be an outlaw. The performances from the entire cast are top notch. Russell Crowe still proves to be a convincing leading man, although his dialect goes a bit off once or twice (although better than Kevin Costner sticking with his American accent). Cate Blanchett is always a treat whenever she’s on-screen, and is the heart of this film. Both Crowe and Blanchett’s chemistry does spark but only so subtle to make the scenes together work. Oscar Isaac is brilliantly juvenile and devilish, practically a scene stealer and one of the best things of this film. Mark Strong delivers a good performance, but unfortunately doesn’t stand out the best of the villains roles he’s played (the best would be as Frank D’Amico in Kick-Ass). Matthew Macfayden plays as the Sheriff of Nottingham, he doesn’t make it as hammy as Alan Rickman did previously but still makes himself being devilishly likeable. Especially when his house is about to get burnt down by the French, and slyly says to a soldier to save his house “I’m half French, on my mothers side!”

The script by Brian Helgeland is also very well done, showing he’s still at his game being a talented writer. Given credit the development of Robin Hood had been going around quite some time, and went through 2-3 stages before they finalised on a story they wanted to make. It’s a story that somehow makes it culturally significant; especially when we’ve just dealt being in the recession. It also brings a strange cultural heritage, having the character and its setting a strange mythical history. Admittedly, the story may mislead people. Given the title ‘Robin Hood’, it should be about Robin Hood and it does. Ridley Scott mentioned he likes to create worlds, and he does so by bringing up events that will revolve around and has Robin involved to make it plausible.

Ridley Scott’s eye for detail is always staggering and beautifully well shown on-screen. The cinematography is gorgeous to look at, shot very well and all around a great looking film. What also strikes me as the film looks it could be plausible in the history books. Although Scott doesn’t treat it as a History Channel documentary, he makes it very clear he mixes with history but also with a bit of fantasy. The action sequences are exciting and thrilling to watch, just shows how much Robin Hood can be an action hero. It also amazes me Ridley Scott is the only filmmaker who’d do these sequences with very little digital effects and make them look spectacular. Also kudos on the wonderful costume design by Janty Yates (who designed costumes for Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven).

The music by Marc Streitenfeld is atmospheric and delivers emotion to every scene being delightful or tragic. Overall; people may expect the conventional Robin Hood tale, but going to a different route can lead to surprising results. This delivers the goods on both story, characters and the visual spectacle. It doesn’t stand along with Scott’s best films (Alien and Blade Runner), but it certainly amongst his really good ones (American Gangster and Kingdom of Heaven: Director’s Cut). I’m very sure there will be a director’s cut version in future. This is epic filmmaking at its best, and no one does it better than Ridley Scott.

Robin Hood is showing at cinemas right now. See the trailer on the official site.

by Owun Birkett

Retro Film Reviews: Thomas Crown Affair.

Some films make you yearn for a bygone era, regardless of whether or not you were born then.The clothes, the manners, women being women, men being men. This film is perfect, sophisticated and sexy. Starring Steve McQueen and Faye Dunaway. The film is slightly dates by some of it’s camera shots, but the script, the acting, the pure class. Norman Jewison is a much under-rated film director.

This film was Steve McQueens favourite of his own films.

Steve McQueen is a multi-millionaire who robs banks just for kicks. Faye Dunaway is the women who works for the insurance company who always gets her man. If you have ever wondered why Steve McQueen is still famous, so many years after his death. Watch this film. it’s a love story, it’s a heist movie, it’s everything a film should be. It is hard to believe this film was made in 1968. 42 years old!

There is one word this film encapsulates: class. Rent it , buy it or steal it. It’s a classic.

Pig Business. Filmmaker Tracy Worcester exposes the price of cheap meat.

I recently saw a film that changed my life. It is easy to say this, but films that change your life are few and far between. The film was called “Pig Business”. Because of it I changed my attitude to cheap, processed meat. As an animal lover, I found some of the scenes heartbreakingly haunting.

Pig Business charts the rise of the factory farm in the USA and the spread of the industrial model into Europe. As we follow filmmaker Tracy Worcester from the giant pig factories in Poland to the sausages on our supermarket shelves, we hear from the individuals affected by this growing industry. We meet migrant workers and the small farmers they replace, find communities overshadowed by giant farms and hear from those affected by air and water pollution.

The experts, including Robert Kennedy Junior, expose the controversial practices of the multinational meat corporations – from the environmental impacts to the destruction of rural livelihoods at home and abroad. As the hidden long-term consequences of factory farming become apparent you find yourself asking ‘does it have to be like this?’. Pig Business shows that all is not lost; consumers have a choice, to support a cruel and unsustainable industry or buy high welfare meat that doesn’t cost the earth

The film has done well in the UK. It ws recently shown at the Real Food Festival and has been shown at The House of Commons. Further afield Tracy will be in Canada presenting the film at Ideas City, Toronto Canada in mid- June.

To help out on the campiagn and find out more info follow the link

www.pigbusiness.co.uk

Stefan Reviews: Four Lions

Chris Morris has always skipped merrily down his own road of good intentions hand in hand with his friend controversy and this has led to him being both admired and detested. With shows like The Day Today and Brass Eye to his name, he has been known to tackle and take the mick out of pretty serious issues (the outstanding BrassEye Special that warned us all of a Paedogeddon springs to mind) and after his comparatively tame appearances in The IT Crowd or his Shoreditch wanker ribbing sitcom Nathan Barley his new Islamic suicide bombing comedy Four Lions certainly lives up to his ‘Media Terrorist’ label.

The film centres around five would be martyrs as they plan to show the Western World what is it is to be (in their ill conceived notion filled minds) a true follower of Islam. It’s easy to feel hatred for someone who would take the lives of innocent people in the name of a belief, but somehow, while the Lions are plotting a horrific event and along with all the laughs, sympathy washes over you from the screen. The audience seem to forget what the characters true intentions are as they watch Omar (played by Riz Ahmed as the obvious brains in the group) display a happy and playful home life with his wife and son or hearing Fessal (Adeel Akhtar) speak lovingly about his dad. Although sympathetic and very funny, there is still a vein of unease running throughout Four Lions, watching parents tell their young child about the glory of martyrdom or seeing Omar knowingly brainwash his dim-witted but pleasant brother, Wej (Kayvan Novak), into ignoring his feelings and look forward to an eternity that can only be compared to the greatness of the Rubber Dinghy Rapids at Alton Towers, makes you wonder if you should really be laughing.

The same can be said for Barry (Nigel Lindsay) who comes across as being a British convert purely as release for his racism towards Jews, anything that goes wrong for him and it’s the Jews fault (even when his car breaks down he blames the Jewish parts). While still a truly horrible person, Barry brings so much humour through his ineptness, stupidity and anger when the others of the group happily insult him to his face while speaking in Urdu. As an outsider, Barry adds an element of hostility in an otherwise close knit team who are able to share jokes while planning destruction and dance along to Toploaders awful song ‘Dancing in the Moonlight’ together. Using this closeness as an ongoing theme, Four Lions fails to ask the question why? Why do these young men who don’t seem to be suffering that much and are not oppressed at all want to blow themselves up. The only answer we seem to get is because of all the ‘Jews and slags an that’ but seeing as this film isn’t a political thriller it doesn’t really need to answer those questions and is happy to stay in the Secret Flat arseing about with explosives!

Judging by Morris’ past efforts Four Lions doesn’t court controversy quite as much as some expected, and would perhaps have worked better a few years ago, but it is still very very funny and should be seen before it ends its cinema run.

Four Lions is rated (15) and is still playing at most cinemas.