Exclusive Paddy Ashdown Interview ‘I Am Devoted To The Liberal Democrats’

Here is part three of our exclusive Paddy Ashdown interview. Take a look at part one and two.

That’s a good answer. In your diaries you are clear about how close you were to Labour before and after the ’97 election, and that PR was the price of coalition. Given that the Lib Dems eventually went into coalition with the Tories, with just a promise of a referendum on AV, how do you think events would have unfolded if you’d accepted a similar deal in ’97?”

I don’t know. I mean I can’t take you through the what would have happened parts of history. I suspect the circumstances would have been very different if we also had the referendum on a sensible system rather than a lesser sensible one. I don’t think you would have had the leading party in the country at the time deliberately doing what they could at the time to destroy the motion and the national newspapers at the time supporting them. That is the ‘what would have happened’ bits of history and we could all spend hours deciding how the world would be different  if Britain hadn’t won the battle of Waterloo; It’s very interesting but it doesn’t bear much relevance.

Paddy_Ashdown_3You also said in your diaries that you were worried that the party would start with Gladstone and end with Ashdown, what do you think was your greatest achievement as the Liberal Democrat Leader?

I have never ever believed that I am a good judge of my own achievements, I leave that to others to decide on what your achievements are. I was very proud to lead the Liberal Democrats for eleven years, I loved it, I am devoted to them. I was also very proud to be the International High Representative in Bosnia for the British Government.  No doubt I made mistakes in both of those jobs, probably quite a lot of them. When you have the privilege of doing jobs like that you can use it to your advantage and I quickly realised what I was good at and what I was bad at.

What do you think will happen with the Liberal Democrats in 2015?

I actually think all the polls now are wrong. I have to rely, as I always have done, on the good judgement of the british electorate, I think we have a good story to tell, we have been in government, everyone said we couldn’t do it. I think we have been more united than the Tories, tougher than the Tories, and played a really serious role in bringing our country through a crisis. If I know the British electorate at all well, when the moment comes, I think we’ll reap the dividends of that. I also think that the British electorate probably, having had the benefit of the coalition may not be very happy returning to absolute power in anybody’s hands. Also, having a coalition of some sort forces people to work together instead of spending all their time scratching each other’s eyes out. Maybe that is a much better system than what we had in the past. Those two things will help us I think.
Who Is Your Favourite Politician?

I think as someone said to me; ‘Who is my hero?’ and I said William Wilberforce who is as unlike me as you could possibly get, apart from Gladstone of course, who is the greatest Prime Minister this country has ever had both internationally and domestically, he was a man who said, “We did not march across the law of anti-slavery, we did not march towards a monument in the distance, we gathered friends like flowers along the way.” and I think he was an extraordinary politician.

Do you think we should have intervened in Syria?

No, I don’t. I’m against intervening in Syria while the opposition is so fractured and defused. Anyways, they’re being funded by extremist elements and encouraging extremist elements so, no, I thought that would lead us towards an engagement in what I think is a widening religious war. I did however think we should intervene in defense of one of the principles pillars of international law; a prohibition on the use of chemical weapons that has stood since 1926 and strained even Hitler and Stalin, and I thought that unless we were prepared to show strength to Assad, not by intervention because we wouldn’t have done, but there was a price to pay that was painful for breaking this principle of international law, then it would only have encouraged the wider spread of chemical weapons. So, no, I don’t think we should have intervened in Syria but I do think we should defend International Law and indeed one of the most important pillars of the international law that preserves some semblance of civilised behaviour in the prosecution of wars.

You testified against Slobodan Milosevic. Was that scary?

No, it wasn’t scary. It was more scary being bombarded by his troops. I mean, I testified about being in the middle of the Albanian villages when they were being bombarded by the main battle units of his army, that was much more scary.

I can understand that. You have done a lot of different things in your life. What is your favourite?

I think there is nothing I’ve done that will match my sense of pride of being a member of parliament for my own community of Yeovil. There is no thing you could ever do that matched being the representative in Westminster of the community you live in and love. So if somebody said you can have one line to put on your gravestone it would be ‘Member of Parliament for Yeovil’.

What was it like being an intelligence officer?

I was a perfectly ordinary diplomat

What is the best advice you have ever received?

Never stop learning.

Thank you Paddy.

 What do you think?

Vote for President at The Hippodrome London… sort of

The run up to the Presidential election, has got everyone riled up so The Hippodrome Casino thinks it only fair that everyone across the pond should have a say too. So in the run up to the election, they will be allowing their (over 18 year old) customers to vote at the bar.

Yes, that’s right, The Hippodrome Casino have launched two new cocktails, The Clinton and The Trump and to vote you must simply pick one over the other to give a fairly accurate* gauge on who will come out on top.

image001-5

The Clinton: a refreshing blend of gin, lemon and lychee juices, and blue curacao for that all important Democrat blue.

The Trump: a mixture of raspberries, Zubrowka, crème de fraise, cranberry and lemon juices, creating a bright Republican red.

The cocktails cost £10 each and can be ordered at The Hippodrome’s Piano Bar. The cocktails will be available until Monday 7th November.

*Your cocktail buying habits will not guarantee your favourite candidate to win the presidential vote. But we really enjoy that The Hippodrome have included us in the voting fever. All in the name of fun!

Interview with Dame Judi Dench and Finty Williams

Interview with Dame Judi Dench and Finty WilliamsOn election day, on May 7th, at 8:25pm, More4 is showing The Vote, a play by James Graham, set in a polling booth during the last 90 minutes before the polls close. The play, which will be screened live from the Donmar Warehouse (at the end of a two-week run), is a unique and ambitious project featuring a cast of over 50, including some stellar names. Chief among them is the acting royalty that is Dame Judi Dench, and her daughter, Finty Williams, who play, appropriately enough a mother and daughter.

Meeting the pair in the quiet opulence of a library in a central London hotel, their bond and mutual affection is immediately palpable, as is their excitement about this remarkable play. Here, they discuss politics, plays and passion, and revel in the joys of working together.

Can you explain a little bit about the concept of The Vote?

F: James Graham and Josie Rourke came up with this idea to set a play in a polling station in Lambeth. They wanted to get a cross-section of people who would come into a polling station in an area like that. So it’s an extraordinary, 52-person event, and we’re a small part of it.

J: It’s impossible to get us all on stage at the same time. Just for the curtain acll.

F: It’s really extraordinary, we did the curtain call yesterday. I found it quite emotional. Seeing all those people on that stage.

J: It’s thrilling.

So, in that respect, is it completely unlike anything you’ve ever done before?

F: Yes!

J: Well, it’s not completely unlike anything I’ve done, because I’ve done the York Mystery Plays three times, and that’s a cast of an enormous amount of people all together, all rehearsing in bits and then getting it all together. This is nothing like that, in content, but I suppose in the working process it’s reminiscent of that. But we only came into it the week before last.

F: We thought we were starring in an epic! And then we saw the first run-through and realised we’re actually in fifteen minutes.

You’re in it longer than most…

F: We are, actually. And we’re very lucky, because we’re in it at the end.

Who do you play?

F: Amazingly, we play mother and daughter. We keep saying “Do we look like mother and daughter?” People look at us as though we’re mad.

J: And we play mother and daughter of the same name: Christine Lola Metcalfe.

F: And the same address.

J: Which is what causes the confusion in the play.

Although you’ve acted together before, is this the first time you’ve played mother and daughter?

F: I’ve been ma, as a younger person.

J: And you’ve been my daughter before. Only on film, though.

F: Oh yes, in Mrs Brown – we did that!

What was it that attracted you to the project?

F: Selfishly, we wanted to work together. But it’s amazing to be part of something that’s so exciting, that people who aren’t in it are so excited about. And at such an extraordinary time, as well. How lucky is that? And to be in a play by James, directed by Josie.

J: And for thirteen performances. It’s a part I’ve waited for all my life, I think. Being with Fint, and to open on one day and twelve days later to close. It’s thrilling.

F: The excitement never goes then.

J: It never goes, because you’re always nervous and always frightened. But it’s a real one-off, it’s exciting and innovative.

And it’s the first time you’ve performed at the Donmar for almost 40 years?

J: Yes. My husband was the first company into the Donmar, with Schweik in the Second World War in 1977, and we followed with…

F: You can say it…

J: I’m not saying it! We followed with the Scottish Play straight afterwards. Although I’ve been to the Donmar, of course, I haven’t played there again. It’s very nice being back there, although much of it I don’t recognise. I recognise the theatre itself, but not anything backstage. We were all in one dressing room back then, the whole company. You certainly couldn’t do that now.

F: It would be tricky to get 52 of us in one dressing room.

Finty, I read that you are most on edge when your family come and see you perform. Does that still apply when your mother is watching you from the other side of the stage?

J: We’re never the other side of the stage. We stick completely together!

F: It’s just about the people who you love the most, whose opinion you value the most. When they come and see it, that’s always a nerve-wracking thing, whether it’s ma, or my boyfriend, who’s an actor, or my son, or very close friends.

J: It’s always that night that you want to go best.

F: And you inevitably come out and go “Oh, but last night it was so much better!”

When you go and see each other in something, are you brutally honest afterwards, if it’s called for?

F: Ma is… this is like a therapy session! I think ma is more honest than I am sometimes. But we have a sort of understanding that if you haven’t enjoyed it then you appreciate the fact that the other person’s got to go on and do it for however many more weeks, and then you can be honest about what you thought of the play, or somebody else in it, or whatever, after they’ve finished.

On election night, the play is going to be broadcast live on More4. What’s that prospect like? Is it nerve-wracking? Do you even still get nervous?

J: Do I get nervous? Yes I do! I get nervous about putting one foot in front of the other. And more so as the years go by! But it’ll be very exciting, because it goes right up to ten o’clock.

F: So we’ll hear the actual exit polls at the end of the show.

J: And then there is a party that goes on all night. And breakfast for the survivors. I very much doubt I’ll be there by then. But, especially this time, what on earth is that night going to be like?

It’s filmed by fix rig cameras. Does that mean they’re very unobtrusive? Will you have performed with them in situ before the night itself?

F: I did The Scottish Play at The Globe…

You see, you can’t say it either…

F: I’m only not saying it because ma’s not saying it! Anyway, that was filmed.

J: I can’t tell you how obtrusive they are. I don’t think we’ll do a performance with them before the final one. We do camera rehearsals. But I don’t think there’s an actual performance with the punters in.

F: I think if you’re on of those actors who constantly looks out at the audience, you might notice them. But I try not to look. Do you?

J: Always try not to look.

There are some incidental scenes that take place in the play that will happen during the ad breaks of the More4 screening. Presumably that means the whole thing will have to be meticulously timed?

F: Yeah. I’m not going to worry about that.

J (laughing): That’s absolutely not our concern, is it?

F: I’m just going to say the lines, and hope we don’t take too long over them.

It’s a wonderful cast, isn’t it?

F: It’s extraordinary.

J: It’s a lovely cast.

F: One of my greatest friends from drama school is in it – Ghiv Chahidi. It’s taken us 21 years to work together. Although he’s worked with ma, and he’s worked with my boyfriend. But we’ve never worked together. And we end up standing next to each other at the end. But it’s amazing people, extraordinary to watch. You say the script is funny – and it is – but it’s genius, what certain people are doing with it. Proper comedic genius. It’s amazing.

What do you think The Vote is saying about the election, and about democracy in general?

J: I don’t know. It’s going to say a lot of different things to a lot of people, I think. It’s an across-the-board look at the situation at the moment and, in a way, how chaotic it is.

F: It’s such a diverse cross section of people who go into the polling station. It sounds naïve, but I’d sort of not really appreciated that you’d get that sort of cross section of people just coming in to one polling station.

J: Or not coming in. We’ve not said about that. All the people who are not going to vote. And feel no responsibility about it whatsoever.

Have you discussed among yourselves how you think your individual characters would vote?

J: My character votes Conservative. I’m settling for that. That’s the kind of person she is. And she’s appalled that her daughter turns to her and says “What do we vote?” She’s a dyed-in-the-wool Conservative.

Are either of you particularly political?

F: My boyfriend is. He’s been out canvassing for Labour. He’s really passionate about it. He’s desperately trying to get me and my son more politically-minded.

J: I have political views, and I voice them, and get very, very angry about things. In my family, we were advised not to talk about religion or politics when we were young. And so we’ve all been able to be very diverse and do what we wanted to do. And see other people’s points of view. Some of them more than others.

F (laughing): We like to see everyone’s point of view, apart from those who don’t agree with us.

It’s an extraordinary political moment. Are you excited about this election?

F: Slightly fearful.

J: Yes, I think I’m fearful. I’m curious about it. But I’m appalled, in a way, about the apathy there is about it. Someone said to me the other day “It’s the most boring election campaign that there’s ever been,” which I have to agree with, I’m afraid.

F: When they start picking up on how many kitchens people have… Really? Is that something that is going to sway people?

J: I heard a programme this morning saying that no-one goes out with a soapbox anymore, because there’s actual fear of doing that. It was interesting. There is a kind of behind the glass attitude to it all now – and actually not talking to people, not engaging with people. Saying the same things over and over again. It’s all election speak now. That’s not what it should all be about. I heard some young people talking, saying nobody talks a language they understand. No-one addresses what they’re thinking about. And indeed they don’t.

After you’ve performed on May 7th, what will you do…

J: Lie down!

Will you sit and watch the election into the early hours?

J: There’s going to be this big party, and breakfast.

F: I’m going to be at the party all night. I will stay there.

Will there be screens? Will it be a political thing?

J: Oh, I think definitely.

F: I’ll be there. I’ll be one of the ones having breakfast.

What’s the best thing about working together?

J: Shorthand. And the fact that we like it so much. We don’t have to pretend that we like it. We actually like it. Michael used to have an expression. He used to say “There are some jobs you run to do.” And for all the fear of having three days’ rehearsal for this, it is a job I run to do, and I can’t wait to actually have that thing of being onstage with Fint.

Was it the same sort of experience for you when you worked with Michael?

J: Yes, it was. You’re frightened for the other person too, so it’s double fright. We did Mr and Mrs Nobody, and Mikey said “We’re going to have such a blast doing this. Lots of laughs, and it’s not very long, so then we’ll get to go home.” Well, it was the hardest thing you can imagine. It was thrilling to do, but we were so tired at the end of the evening.

F: And the learning was tricky, wasn’t it? Ma used to be upstairs in our house with me, learning lines. Dad would be downstairs. We’d have a running supper, it would go round the house.

Was it things like doing lines with your mum that inspired you into the same line of work?

F: No. I don’t know if it’s the same thing if you’re the daughter of a brilliant brain surgeon, who is incredibly good at what they do, works with incredible people and – not quite the same for the brain surgeon – gets to wear great costumes. That’s inspiring. And ma makes it great fun. I spent most of my teenage years in the National Theatre. Mum would go on to do a scene in Hamlet, come back, get changed to go back on and do another scene, and she’d come back and I’d be wearing her entire first costume in the dressing room. That was what I loved. And to hear the applause at the end for her. That still really gets me. That’s the person I love, and they’re being appreciated by all these people. I watch Britain’s Got Talent, and someone’s there saying they’re proud of their parent or their daughter, and then they get a standing ovation, and I’m in floods of tears. It’s a really deep-seated pride.

J: Fint originally wanted to be an acrobatic nurse. And we were very, very keen. Michael said “You’ve got to do it.” Can you imagine? Swinging up the ward to take somebody’s temperature upside down. Absolutely thrilling.

How did you feel when she revealed her intention to go into acting?

We were incredibly excited about it, and said “I suppose it was inevitable.”

What are the roles that have meant the most to you over the years?

J: Over sixty years!

F: Anything at The Globe, because it’s just the best. Playing Maria in Twelfth Night at The National. Ma did a play called Entertaining Strangers when I was about 14, which totally changed my life, I loved it so much. It was directed by Peter Hall, and it was in the Cottesloe. And I remember saying to ma “If I coukld just be in a play directed by Peter Hall at the Cottesloe, I’d be the happiest person in the world. And when I was doing Bedroom Farce, that he directed, which was another big favourite, he asked me to audition for Maria in Twelfth Night in the Cottesloe. And I got the job, and I came out and phoned ma, and I stood on the phone to ma outside the National howling, literally howling. And later on, we were rehearsing for it, and it was all wonderful, and we were doing Malvolio’s letter scene, and they’d picked up a load of letters from the props store, and I opened a letter, and it was one of the letters that had been used in Entertaining Strangers all that time before. That was probably the best. Ma, 60 years, go for it!

J: It’s really for people, for actors and actresses and the company and the director of course, that you remember things. Plays I did with Mikey. When we got the chance to work together it was thrilling. Not so thrilling when we did The Merchant of Venice, a play I don’t like very much. We were just married, and I turned to him and said “I speak too long; but ’tis to peize the time, To eke it and to draw it out in length, To stay you from erection.” And it’s ‘election’ of course. At which point, the Royal Shakespeare band just put their instruments down and had to walk off.

I loved playing Anthony and Cleopatra, because I was an unbelievably unlikely choice to play Cleopatra. I loved every minute of it. And I loved working with Peter. And I loved A Little Night Music, getting to sing and do Cabaret.

F: There was also an amazing show she did called The Gift of the Gorgon, which she didn’t have the best time doing, it was a very tricky play. But it floored me. Amazing.

Are there any particular parts that either of you would particularly like to play?

J: I never know what part I should do. I can never think if what I’d like to do, I wait until somebody says “This is a part you ought to have a go at.” Fint?

F: I want to play Miss Adelaide in Guys and Dolls. Really badly. And I’d like to work with [boyfriend] Joe, properly. Like ma got to do with dad.

J: Perhaps we could all be in a play together.

F: We could age-up Guys and Dolls, and you could play Miss Adelaide.

J: No, no, no. I’d be an old person, sitting in a chair watching. Tapping my foot to the music.

If you could work on one other project together, what would you choose?

J: I like a new play.

F: Something where we have a big entrance at the end, down a big fl… actually, not down a big flight of stairs.

J (laughing): I could come down in a lift.

F: You could have a Stair Lift. And we could be wearing wonderful red dresses cut up to the thigh.

J: That would be very, very good!

F: And an amazing dance number. Maybe I’ll do the dance number. You can just stand still and do something extraordinary in the middle.

The Vote is on Thursday May 7th, at 8:25pm, More4

With thanks to Channel 4. 

 

 

The London Mayoral Election – Can You Really Bring Yourself to Vote for Ken? 10 Reasons To Make You Think Before You Do

It’s now less than a week to go to the London mayoral election and it’s is a two-horse race between the Conservative incumbent, Boris Johnson and the former mayor and Labour candidate, Ken Livingstone.

In the polls, Ken is behind, somewhere between 2 and 10 points behind according to the latest figures. This is surprising when the same polls suggest the Conservatives are 15 points behind in London and set to get hammered in the local elections. This is down to two factors, Boris’s charisma and Ken’s cronyism.

Ken has brushed off Labour supporters voting against him (up to one in five is expected to vote for Boris). ‘They are only voting for Boris because he makes them laugh’, says Ken. This is only partly true. Yes, Boris’s charisma and flair are a factor, but so is Ken. Many voters simply can’t bring themselves to vote for Ken because they don’t trust him and you can’t blame them.

Whatever side of the political spectrum you come from, it’s vital that we hold our politicians to account. In my eyes, Ken has been slippery and divisive at best. A self-confessed political nerd, he is everything which is wrong in modern politics today. He will do or say anything to win. It says a lot that many senior figures in the Labour party not only won’t offer their support for him, but are actively risking their own standing in the party to campaign against him.

“In my opinion he is a driven, power-crazed egomaniac who will do anything to regain the power he once had,” says Lord Sugar.

He is “quite a tricky sort of customer” who has “espoused some disastrous causes,” says another Labour peer, Robert Winston.

Here’s a top 10 of Ken gaffes, cronyism, hypocrisy and champagne socialism:

  • Ken was heavily criticised in February 2005 for remarks made to an Evening Standard reporter. He compared him to a Nazi concentration camp guard, after the Jewish reporter had tried to interview him. Ken refused to apologise or retract the statement after the reporter let it be known he was Jewish.
  • In December 2007, the Evening Standard published news of an investigation into grants worth £2.5 million paid to organisations in which Ken Livingstone’s adviser Lee Jasper was involved. It is confirmed that some of these grants were paid directly by the mayor’s office. An independent report into the affair by auditor Michael Haworth-Maden in July 2009 found no evidence of “misappropriation of funds” but noted “significant” gaps in financial paperwork.
  • Livingstone was criticised following a 21 March 2006 press conference at which he is alleged to have said of David and Simon Reuben — two Indian-born Jewish businessmen involved in a property development project — that “if they’re not happy they can always go back to Iran and see if they can do better under the Ayatollahs.”
  • Following Livingstone’s defeat in the 2008 Mayoral Elections, the Daily Mail reported that “eight ‘cronies’ of Ken were to receive £1.6 million in pay-offs following his defeat in the London mayoral elections.”
  • Livingstone has been criticised for his links to Islamic extremism. He was heavily condemned for inviting Islamic scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi to a conference. Al-Qaradawi has been accused of supporting “female genital mutilation, wife-beating, and the execution of homosexuals.”
  • In a meeting, Ken is alleged to have said that he did not expect the Jewish community to vote Labour as votes for the left are inversely proportional to wealth levels. He supposedly suggested that as the Jewish community is rich they simply wouldn’t vote for him.
  • Ken has been accused of hypocrisy over his tax affairs. He was very critical of wealthy Londoners who used companies to lower the rate of tax they were paying. It subsequently transpired he was doing exactly the same himself through the company Silveta Ltd.
  • Ken used private healthcare despite claiming to be a strong proponent of the NHS.
  • Ken cried over a campaign film of ‘ordinary Londoners’, arguing why they wanted Ken as mayor. It subsequently transpired the film was scripted and made using paid actors. Both of which Ken knew about.
  • Ken’s trip to Cuba and aborted journey to Venezuela in 2006 cost Londoners £30,000 according to assembly figures. Just one of many wasteful incidents.

The Labour party fearfully nominated Ken as their candidate and it may cost them. They still have bad memories from 2001 when they didn’t give Ken the nomination and he won a stunning victory against them as an independent.

They feared Ken running as an independent again, splitting their vote, and handing Boris an easy victory. Nevertheless, the decision to choose Ken may yet haunt them. One can’t help thinking that any other half-decent candidate would have had a very good chance of beating Boris. Figures like Ken have no place in modern politics. If we vote for them, we get what we deserve.