Interview with Dame Judi Dench and Finty Williams

Interview with Dame Judi Dench and Finty WilliamsOn election day, on May 7th, at 8:25pm, More4 is showing The Vote, a play by James Graham, set in a polling booth during the last 90 minutes before the polls close. The play, which will be screened live from the Donmar Warehouse (at the end of a two-week run), is a unique and ambitious project featuring a cast of over 50, including some stellar names. Chief among them is the acting royalty that is Dame Judi Dench, and her daughter, Finty Williams, who play, appropriately enough a mother and daughter.

Meeting the pair in the quiet opulence of a library in a central London hotel, their bond and mutual affection is immediately palpable, as is their excitement about this remarkable play. Here, they discuss politics, plays and passion, and revel in the joys of working together.

Can you explain a little bit about the concept of The Vote?

F: James Graham and Josie Rourke came up with this idea to set a play in a polling station in Lambeth. They wanted to get a cross-section of people who would come into a polling station in an area like that. So it’s an extraordinary, 52-person event, and we’re a small part of it.

J: It’s impossible to get us all on stage at the same time. Just for the curtain acll.

F: It’s really extraordinary, we did the curtain call yesterday. I found it quite emotional. Seeing all those people on that stage.

J: It’s thrilling.

So, in that respect, is it completely unlike anything you’ve ever done before?

F: Yes!

J: Well, it’s not completely unlike anything I’ve done, because I’ve done the York Mystery Plays three times, and that’s a cast of an enormous amount of people all together, all rehearsing in bits and then getting it all together. This is nothing like that, in content, but I suppose in the working process it’s reminiscent of that. But we only came into it the week before last.

F: We thought we were starring in an epic! And then we saw the first run-through and realised we’re actually in fifteen minutes.

You’re in it longer than most…

F: We are, actually. And we’re very lucky, because we’re in it at the end.

Who do you play?

F: Amazingly, we play mother and daughter. We keep saying “Do we look like mother and daughter?” People look at us as though we’re mad.

J: And we play mother and daughter of the same name: Christine Lola Metcalfe.

F: And the same address.

J: Which is what causes the confusion in the play.

Although you’ve acted together before, is this the first time you’ve played mother and daughter?

F: I’ve been ma, as a younger person.

J: And you’ve been my daughter before. Only on film, though.

F: Oh yes, in Mrs Brown – we did that!

What was it that attracted you to the project?

F: Selfishly, we wanted to work together. But it’s amazing to be part of something that’s so exciting, that people who aren’t in it are so excited about. And at such an extraordinary time, as well. How lucky is that? And to be in a play by James, directed by Josie.

J: And for thirteen performances. It’s a part I’ve waited for all my life, I think. Being with Fint, and to open on one day and twelve days later to close. It’s thrilling.

F: The excitement never goes then.

J: It never goes, because you’re always nervous and always frightened. But it’s a real one-off, it’s exciting and innovative.

And it’s the first time you’ve performed at the Donmar for almost 40 years?

J: Yes. My husband was the first company into the Donmar, with Schweik in the Second World War in 1977, and we followed with…

F: You can say it…

J: I’m not saying it! We followed with the Scottish Play straight afterwards. Although I’ve been to the Donmar, of course, I haven’t played there again. It’s very nice being back there, although much of it I don’t recognise. I recognise the theatre itself, but not anything backstage. We were all in one dressing room back then, the whole company. You certainly couldn’t do that now.

F: It would be tricky to get 52 of us in one dressing room.

Finty, I read that you are most on edge when your family come and see you perform. Does that still apply when your mother is watching you from the other side of the stage?

J: We’re never the other side of the stage. We stick completely together!

F: It’s just about the people who you love the most, whose opinion you value the most. When they come and see it, that’s always a nerve-wracking thing, whether it’s ma, or my boyfriend, who’s an actor, or my son, or very close friends.

J: It’s always that night that you want to go best.

F: And you inevitably come out and go “Oh, but last night it was so much better!”

When you go and see each other in something, are you brutally honest afterwards, if it’s called for?

F: Ma is… this is like a therapy session! I think ma is more honest than I am sometimes. But we have a sort of understanding that if you haven’t enjoyed it then you appreciate the fact that the other person’s got to go on and do it for however many more weeks, and then you can be honest about what you thought of the play, or somebody else in it, or whatever, after they’ve finished.

On election night, the play is going to be broadcast live on More4. What’s that prospect like? Is it nerve-wracking? Do you even still get nervous?

J: Do I get nervous? Yes I do! I get nervous about putting one foot in front of the other. And more so as the years go by! But it’ll be very exciting, because it goes right up to ten o’clock.

F: So we’ll hear the actual exit polls at the end of the show.

J: And then there is a party that goes on all night. And breakfast for the survivors. I very much doubt I’ll be there by then. But, especially this time, what on earth is that night going to be like?

It’s filmed by fix rig cameras. Does that mean they’re very unobtrusive? Will you have performed with them in situ before the night itself?

F: I did The Scottish Play at The Globe…

You see, you can’t say it either…

F: I’m only not saying it because ma’s not saying it! Anyway, that was filmed.

J: I can’t tell you how obtrusive they are. I don’t think we’ll do a performance with them before the final one. We do camera rehearsals. But I don’t think there’s an actual performance with the punters in.

F: I think if you’re on of those actors who constantly looks out at the audience, you might notice them. But I try not to look. Do you?

J: Always try not to look.

There are some incidental scenes that take place in the play that will happen during the ad breaks of the More4 screening. Presumably that means the whole thing will have to be meticulously timed?

F: Yeah. I’m not going to worry about that.

J (laughing): That’s absolutely not our concern, is it?

F: I’m just going to say the lines, and hope we don’t take too long over them.

It’s a wonderful cast, isn’t it?

F: It’s extraordinary.

J: It’s a lovely cast.

F: One of my greatest friends from drama school is in it – Ghiv Chahidi. It’s taken us 21 years to work together. Although he’s worked with ma, and he’s worked with my boyfriend. But we’ve never worked together. And we end up standing next to each other at the end. But it’s amazing people, extraordinary to watch. You say the script is funny – and it is – but it’s genius, what certain people are doing with it. Proper comedic genius. It’s amazing.

What do you think The Vote is saying about the election, and about democracy in general?

J: I don’t know. It’s going to say a lot of different things to a lot of people, I think. It’s an across-the-board look at the situation at the moment and, in a way, how chaotic it is.

F: It’s such a diverse cross section of people who go into the polling station. It sounds naïve, but I’d sort of not really appreciated that you’d get that sort of cross section of people just coming in to one polling station.

J: Or not coming in. We’ve not said about that. All the people who are not going to vote. And feel no responsibility about it whatsoever.

Have you discussed among yourselves how you think your individual characters would vote?

J: My character votes Conservative. I’m settling for that. That’s the kind of person she is. And she’s appalled that her daughter turns to her and says “What do we vote?” She’s a dyed-in-the-wool Conservative.

Are either of you particularly political?

F: My boyfriend is. He’s been out canvassing for Labour. He’s really passionate about it. He’s desperately trying to get me and my son more politically-minded.

J: I have political views, and I voice them, and get very, very angry about things. In my family, we were advised not to talk about religion or politics when we were young. And so we’ve all been able to be very diverse and do what we wanted to do. And see other people’s points of view. Some of them more than others.

F (laughing): We like to see everyone’s point of view, apart from those who don’t agree with us.

It’s an extraordinary political moment. Are you excited about this election?

F: Slightly fearful.

J: Yes, I think I’m fearful. I’m curious about it. But I’m appalled, in a way, about the apathy there is about it. Someone said to me the other day “It’s the most boring election campaign that there’s ever been,” which I have to agree with, I’m afraid.

F: When they start picking up on how many kitchens people have… Really? Is that something that is going to sway people?

J: I heard a programme this morning saying that no-one goes out with a soapbox anymore, because there’s actual fear of doing that. It was interesting. There is a kind of behind the glass attitude to it all now – and actually not talking to people, not engaging with people. Saying the same things over and over again. It’s all election speak now. That’s not what it should all be about. I heard some young people talking, saying nobody talks a language they understand. No-one addresses what they’re thinking about. And indeed they don’t.

After you’ve performed on May 7th, what will you do…

J: Lie down!

Will you sit and watch the election into the early hours?

J: There’s going to be this big party, and breakfast.

F: I’m going to be at the party all night. I will stay there.

Will there be screens? Will it be a political thing?

J: Oh, I think definitely.

F: I’ll be there. I’ll be one of the ones having breakfast.

What’s the best thing about working together?

J: Shorthand. And the fact that we like it so much. We don’t have to pretend that we like it. We actually like it. Michael used to have an expression. He used to say “There are some jobs you run to do.” And for all the fear of having three days’ rehearsal for this, it is a job I run to do, and I can’t wait to actually have that thing of being onstage with Fint.

Was it the same sort of experience for you when you worked with Michael?

J: Yes, it was. You’re frightened for the other person too, so it’s double fright. We did Mr and Mrs Nobody, and Mikey said “We’re going to have such a blast doing this. Lots of laughs, and it’s not very long, so then we’ll get to go home.” Well, it was the hardest thing you can imagine. It was thrilling to do, but we were so tired at the end of the evening.

F: And the learning was tricky, wasn’t it? Ma used to be upstairs in our house with me, learning lines. Dad would be downstairs. We’d have a running supper, it would go round the house.

Was it things like doing lines with your mum that inspired you into the same line of work?

F: No. I don’t know if it’s the same thing if you’re the daughter of a brilliant brain surgeon, who is incredibly good at what they do, works with incredible people and – not quite the same for the brain surgeon – gets to wear great costumes. That’s inspiring. And ma makes it great fun. I spent most of my teenage years in the National Theatre. Mum would go on to do a scene in Hamlet, come back, get changed to go back on and do another scene, and she’d come back and I’d be wearing her entire first costume in the dressing room. That was what I loved. And to hear the applause at the end for her. That still really gets me. That’s the person I love, and they’re being appreciated by all these people. I watch Britain’s Got Talent, and someone’s there saying they’re proud of their parent or their daughter, and then they get a standing ovation, and I’m in floods of tears. It’s a really deep-seated pride.

J: Fint originally wanted to be an acrobatic nurse. And we were very, very keen. Michael said “You’ve got to do it.” Can you imagine? Swinging up the ward to take somebody’s temperature upside down. Absolutely thrilling.

How did you feel when she revealed her intention to go into acting?

We were incredibly excited about it, and said “I suppose it was inevitable.”

What are the roles that have meant the most to you over the years?

J: Over sixty years!

F: Anything at The Globe, because it’s just the best. Playing Maria in Twelfth Night at The National. Ma did a play called Entertaining Strangers when I was about 14, which totally changed my life, I loved it so much. It was directed by Peter Hall, and it was in the Cottesloe. And I remember saying to ma “If I coukld just be in a play directed by Peter Hall at the Cottesloe, I’d be the happiest person in the world. And when I was doing Bedroom Farce, that he directed, which was another big favourite, he asked me to audition for Maria in Twelfth Night in the Cottesloe. And I got the job, and I came out and phoned ma, and I stood on the phone to ma outside the National howling, literally howling. And later on, we were rehearsing for it, and it was all wonderful, and we were doing Malvolio’s letter scene, and they’d picked up a load of letters from the props store, and I opened a letter, and it was one of the letters that had been used in Entertaining Strangers all that time before. That was probably the best. Ma, 60 years, go for it!

J: It’s really for people, for actors and actresses and the company and the director of course, that you remember things. Plays I did with Mikey. When we got the chance to work together it was thrilling. Not so thrilling when we did The Merchant of Venice, a play I don’t like very much. We were just married, and I turned to him and said “I speak too long; but ’tis to peize the time, To eke it and to draw it out in length, To stay you from erection.” And it’s ‘election’ of course. At which point, the Royal Shakespeare band just put their instruments down and had to walk off.

I loved playing Anthony and Cleopatra, because I was an unbelievably unlikely choice to play Cleopatra. I loved every minute of it. And I loved working with Peter. And I loved A Little Night Music, getting to sing and do Cabaret.

F: There was also an amazing show she did called The Gift of the Gorgon, which she didn’t have the best time doing, it was a very tricky play. But it floored me. Amazing.

Are there any particular parts that either of you would particularly like to play?

J: I never know what part I should do. I can never think if what I’d like to do, I wait until somebody says “This is a part you ought to have a go at.” Fint?

F: I want to play Miss Adelaide in Guys and Dolls. Really badly. And I’d like to work with [boyfriend] Joe, properly. Like ma got to do with dad.

J: Perhaps we could all be in a play together.

F: We could age-up Guys and Dolls, and you could play Miss Adelaide.

J: No, no, no. I’d be an old person, sitting in a chair watching. Tapping my foot to the music.

If you could work on one other project together, what would you choose?

J: I like a new play.

F: Something where we have a big entrance at the end, down a big fl… actually, not down a big flight of stairs.

J (laughing): I could come down in a lift.

F: You could have a Stair Lift. And we could be wearing wonderful red dresses cut up to the thigh.

J: That would be very, very good!

F: And an amazing dance number. Maybe I’ll do the dance number. You can just stand still and do something extraordinary in the middle.

The Vote is on Thursday May 7th, at 8:25pm, More4

With thanks to Channel 4. 

 

 

The Antarctic Pavilion: Alexander Ponomarev – Concordia

Fondaco Marcello, Calle dei Garzoni, Grand Canal, Venice 56th Venice Biennale of Art

Saturday 9th May –  Sunday 22nd November 

The Antarctic Pavilion- Alexander Ponomarev – Concordia1

For anyone who happens to be in Venice between the above dates I think I trip to the Antarctic Pavilion would be an extraordinary experience. Following the critical success of the Antarctic Pavilion’s inaugural exhibition at the 14th Venice Architecture Biennale, Concordia is a major installation by the celebrated Russian artist Alexander Ponomarev.

The Antarctic Pavilion- Alexander Ponomarev – Concordia voice in thewilderness

Concordia is Latin for ‘harmony’ – the personification of concord, a treaty or pact. It is also the name basis of the Costa Concordia, wrecked off the coast of Italy in 2012 after a catastrophic blunder by its captain who abandoned ship before the safe evacuation of his 3,229 passengers.

For the 56th Venice Biennale of Art, Alexander Ponomarev’s installation, curated by Nadim Samman, deploys the Costa Concordia disaster – specifically, the broken pact between Captain Schettino and his passengers – as a provocative lens through which to view the fragility of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. This agreement suspended military activity and sovereign claims on the continent’s territory, limiting human activity there to the pursuit of peaceful scientific endeavour. As the global struggle for resources intensifies, the future of this treaty is in peril.

In Ponomarev’s sculptural intervention a scale model of the grounded Concordia, tilting like a tipped iceberg (or perhaps a shift in the polar axis itself) stands as an image of terrestrial re- orientation: a new worldview.

The Antarctic Pavilion- Alexander Ponomarev – Concordia4

Elsewhere in the exhibition, fire invokes a notorious act of arson by a staff doctor from the Argentinean Almirante Brown station, who burnt his base to the ground when the setting sun announced the onset of winter.

Further works are based on the artist’s recent expedition to the (Russian Orthodox) Trinity Church of Antarctica when the whole expedition party received marriage sacraments from the southern continent’s only resident monk.

In addition to its invoking of paradigmatic disasters, Concordia is a meditation on community, responsibility, security and the strength of the ties that bind us together amid shifting personal and political landscapes.

The Antarctic Pavilion is a European interface platform for The Antarctic Biennale, to be held in Antarctica in 2016 aboard international research vessels. The Antarctic Biennale is also devised and implemented by artist Alexander Ponomarev and curated by Nadim Samman both of whom were named by Foreign Policy Magazine among the ‘100 Leading Global Thinkers’ of 2014 ‘for designing a blueprint for Antarctic culture.

www.antarcticpavilion.com

 

 

THE FAERIE TREE: A Book In The Making | Beltane

THE FAERIE TREE- A book in the making | BeltanefairytreeaprilBeltane: a season of fertility and fire, a time to welcome new life into the earth. A good time to contact spirits or interact with the Fae.

After the rigours of the last few weeks I am absolutely convinced that releasing a new book is akin to passing through fire. Or at very least, virtual fire. I seem to have spent most of my time tweeting, googling, goodreading, facebooking and linking in. Even my dreams – or nightmares – have been seen through the prism of my laptop or iPad screen.

Why? I have been chasing the writer’s holy grail: reviews. In a world where there are thousands of books, how else are readers to choose what to read? And without the right number of reviews (rumoured to be at least fifty) you are not going to kick on with those all important Amazon search algorithms.

THE FAERIE TREE- A book in the making | BeltanebluebellsinFT

Of course hunting down reviews is a potentially risky business because even when you ask… or suggest… that bloggers and other opinion formers review the book you cannot, quite rightly, influence what they say. With my first novel, The Cheesemaker’s House, I had my (only) one star review early on so I got it out of the way. With The Faerie Tree I’m still waiting. No fewer than three stars anywhere. Yet.

Of course there are reviews which are downright irritating and it just isn’t the done thing (again, quite rightly) to reply. Top of my list are the people who spell the main characters’ names wrong; I know reviewers are busy people but if they have skim-read a book they ought to admit to it. I subscribe to the Alliance of Independent Authors’ Ethical Author code (for more information see here: http://allianceindependentauthors.org/ethical-author/) and part of that is about being open and transparent when I review other people’s books. I would love all reviewers to do the same.

On the upside, there are reviewers you just want to pick up and hug. Like the one who completely got the fact that part of my reason for writing the book was to give people who suffer from depression a positive portrayal. Like the one on Goodreads who realised the book wasn’t really their thing but gave it three stars anyway because it was well written. Like the reviews that just make me laugh.

Some of that laughter could just be relief. Until a book is out there you never really know how it will be received. Overall, it’s doing really well; 4 ½ stars on Amazon and 4.1 on Goodreads. People are generally gripped by it – one reader in South Africa finished it by torchlight during a power cut. They are enjoying the characters, their relationships, their stories.

But I am learning, too. Of course it’s too late to change The Faerie Tree now but there is a significant minority who are finding one of the main characters irritating – have I got that wrong? And others feel the resolution of the mystery is too obscure… or even completely lacking. Should I have spelt it out a little more? All useful things to consider as I complete the first draft of my next offering and begin the editing process.

But, being Beltane, I have lifted my eyes from the screen and ventured out into sunshine in the natural world. Where better to go than the fairy tree wood in Hampshire where the story began? And to thank the faeries, elves and pixies who live there for their very large contribution to the success of their book.

The Faerie Tree is available as an ebook or paperback from Amazon, Kobo, Waterstones and to order from all major bookstores. Find out more at http://janecable.com/the-book/4588312168 .

 

 

Avengers: Age of Ultron {Film Review}

One of the most anticipated movies of the summer has finally hit cinemas and anticipation would be an understatement. After the release of both Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Guardians of the Galaxy last year, both fans and general audiences were expecting this 11th entry in Marvel Cinematic Universe to top everything off.

After the events of The Winter Soldier, The Avengers (consists of Steve Rogers/Captain America (Chris Evans), Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Bruce Banner/Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) and Clint Barton/Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner)) pursue the last HYDRA commander, Baron Wolfgang von Strucker (Thomas Kretschmann). However, they also come across Strucker’s experiments with the twins, Pietro Maximoff/Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) (changed from being mutants and Magneto’s children to experiments, due to 20th Century Fox owning rights to X-Men). Stark starts thinking about retiring from being Iron Man and starts creating, along with Banner, a new set of A.I. drones to tackle future threats (even extraterrestrial). Thus Ultron (James Spader) is born but doesn’t pan out as expected. Like a new child, he quickly takes action by having one primary goal; human extinction.

avengers_age_of_ultron_ver11_xlgThe movie doesn’t waste any time setting things up (if you haven’t been following the events from previous movies, good luck) and we’re straight into our first big action set-piece. It may feel a little rushed at times but it all flows seamlessly together. The whole MCU is already established at this point, though the few scenes where it takes a break from the action is one of the highlights. The entire cast fits into their characters like a glove, fully adjusting to their roles that we’ve been following since 2008. It completely shows their camaraderie as working in a team, as what made The Avengers such a treat to watch. Their witty banter and emotional connection are probably one of the most compelling moments in this movie (especially a running gag with Rogers and the team). We’re even given more back-story to Barton and Romanoff, which fleshed out their characters in a huge way than before. Both Maximoff twins are a welcome addition, giving Avengers an extra challenge to tackle. Wanda uses her hypnosis to bring out the team’s fears, thus adding a human layer to their characterisation.There are a few additional characters put into the mix (Andy Serkis as Ulysses Klaue to name one of many and antagonist for future Black Panther film) and may feel a little much to take all in but you tend to go along with the ride. Though it’s James Spader who steals the spot-light and he’s the most charismatic and intimidating villain since Loki. His introduction is undeniably gripping and quite spine-chilling with his speech towards the Avengers. He observes the world with childlike perception, slowly growing incredibly intellectual but also persistent on bringing total destruction on a global scale.

Writer/director Joss Whedon may excel on delivering wisecracks here and there but doesn’t fall short of the spectacle and there’s plenty of that on display! The creative fight combos between the heroes (mainly from Captain America and Thor) shows their ability to work as a team. The Hulkbuster vs Hulk scene was incredibly entertaining to watch, yet follows Man of Steel’s complete utter city destruction (may not be on the same scale but comes close). The design of Ultron is pretty much a Terminator pumped with steroids but given a face similar to Michael Bay’s Transformers movies. Given a lot to deliver expressions from the face with Spader also providing motion-capture performance. Although Quicksilver was the scene-stealer from X-Men: Days of Future Past, this portrayal of Quicksilver is just as creative and does convey his intense speed through-out the movie. Brian Tyler and Danny Elfman’s score gets you pumped for rooting our heroes but also delivering the right emotional notes during such scenes with our characters.

Overall; one of the best entries in the series. It somewhat surpasses the sequel on expanding the MCU series but also fleshing out our protagonist’s and making it worth investing from beginning to end. Joss Whedon makes his last outing with Marvel a bang and has given us a fantastic villain with Ultron. Next up, Ant-Man.

5 out of 5

p.s. Stay for a mid-credits scene, though you probably were ready to do that anyways.

Coming Home By Annabel Kantaria Book Review

Coming Home , book, book review. Annabel KantariaAfter a heavy work week I was looking for something enjoyable to read. Luckily Coming Home By Annabel Kantaria came through the letterbox. I was drawn in from the first page. The story is engaging with enough twists to keep you guessing. The character of Evie is likeable and warm, even when her mother is bringing out her immaturity. Kantaria captures family life and all of its difficulties. I enjoyed this book and read it quickly. It is a triumphant debut from Annabel Kantaria. Recommended.

 

‘An utterly compelling story of loss and betrayal – I loved it’ – Judy Finnigan
Your parents make you who you are.

But how much do you really know about them?

After her father unexpectedly passes away, Evie leaves her life in Dubai behind, and returns to England. Her family home is the same as it ever was: perfectly pristine, but filled with her mother’s unspoken grief for Evie’s brother, who was killed as a child in a tragic accident.

Evie knew that coming home would be hard. But whatever she expected, she’s definitely not prepared for her whole life to unravel in front of her. And as one secret after another is uncovered, she begins to realise that everything she thought she knew about her family has been one big lie…

Coming Home is available here.

 

 

Way Upstream by Alan Ayckbourn at Chichester Festival Theatre

Credit: Simon Annand

Credit: Simon Annand

When a play requires a river, a tree-lined bank and a floating motor cruiser as its set, it’s destined to be seldom performed. But Chichester Festival Theatre doesn’t scare easily when it comes to technical challenges and Nadia Fall’s extraordinary production of Alan Ayckbourn’s dark comedy easily meets the play’s epic technical demands.

With most of the action taking place onboard Hadforth Bounty the first half is where the laughs are to be had. Keith and June have taken to the water with colleagues and business partners Alastair and Emma for a jolly waterways holiday. Trouble on dry land back at their novelty goods factory sees PA Mrs Hatfield (Nicola Sloane) having to show up bankside with daily updates. Brash and self-important, Keith (Peter Forbes) quickly nominates himself as captain, while his disgruntled wife June (Sarah Parish) carps, huffs and idles. Lily-livered Alastair (Jason Hughes) and his timid missus Emma (Jill Halfpenny) end up doing the bulk of the graft, resentment building like a slowly developing tidal wave.

But the sit-com feel and the jokes at the expense of well-drawn middle-class characters give way to altogether nastier themes. With the arrival of Vince (Jason Durr), a savvy and seemingly harmless bit of eye candy who does, unlike the novice sailors, at least seem to know how to avoid capsizing, initial barbed teasing swiftly degenerates into disturbing casual cruelty, punctuated only by drunken revels and sexual shenanigans. Manipulating Keith off the boat to go and deal with the threat of strike action back at the factory, Vince introduces minxy Fleur (Emily Laing) into the equation, all the while ramping up the intimidation and spite.

As Ayckbourn highlights the consequences of power in the wrong hands and the fallout of perpetual feebleness, the laughter from the audience gets increasingly nervous.

Fabulously played, the performances are all stunningly good; not even Ben Stones gloriously clever set, beautifully lit by Tim Mitchell, can upstage this superb cast.

An odd but nevertheless compelling play, the launch of the 2015 Festival season at Chichester makes an impressive splash.

Until 16 May. Box office: 01243 781312; www.cft.org.uk

Vicky Edwards

Month 3 of My Reading Challenge By Frances Colville

Travel writing is one of my favourite genres so I was happy to see that Road to Rouen by Ben Hatch had arrived at the top of my pile.  In fact the book is more about family life and relationships than about travelling, but is none the worse for that.  It tells the story of his journey around France in a Passat, which smells strongly of French cheese, with his wife and two young children and is by turns funny, poignant and insightful.  A good follow-up to his earlier book Are We Nearly There Yet? – surely a question that every parent has heard far too often.

reading, reviews, book, review,

Second up this month was The Way of the World by Robert Goddard a thriller set in the immediate aftermath of the First World War, and the first part of a trilogy.  I always enjoy his books and I think I’ve read most, if not all, of them.  I’d be hard put to it though to distinguish one from the other in retrospect, and I’m fairly sure I’ll have to re-read this one in a year’s time before moving on to the second in the series.  But I’d still rate it as an interesting and well-put-together book.  And if you haven’t discovered Robert Goddard before, this is a good place to start.

MONTH 3 OF MY READING CHALLENGE by Frances Colville books

The Bees by Laline Paull has left me feeling confused.  It’s most certainly a very original and well written debut novel, but I find myself at the end with a vague suspicion that it doesn’t work quite as well as it should.  I wonder whether others have the same reservations as I do, and whether this dystopian tale of a totalitarian bee-hive really works on levels other than a fairy tale.  But highly recommended if you want something different.  Good books are supposed to leave you wondering,  aren’t they?

Next I picked up The Minaturist by Jessie Burton. Another debut novel, this is a fascinating mix of history (17th century Amsterdam), intrigue and a coming of age story.  A real page-turner.  I couldn’t put it down. But yet again I was left feeling dissatisfied.  I don’t think all the questions posed were fully answered, and I don’t think the plot quite held together.  But perhaps I read it too quickly and missed vital information.  I’d better go back for another look.  I’ll enjoy doing that!

MONTH 3 OF MY READING CHALLENGE by Frances Colville bookreview

No quibbles about the next book Elizabeth is Missing by Emma Healeyand no hesitation at all in recommending it.  Yet again a debut novel, this one taps into a situation with which more and more of us are becoming familiar – how living with dementia feels, or how you cope with having a relative with dementia.  The central character Maud is totally believable and the struggles she faces daily are sympathetically portrayed.  And there is an intriguing storyline in here too. Ultimately, despite what you might expect, this is an uplifting and positive book.  I loved it.

MONTH 3 OF MY READING CHALLENGE by Frances Colville delicously ella

I don’t normally read cookery books from cover to cover.  But Deliciously Ella by Ella Woodwardis a cookery book with a difference.  It’s the inspirational story of how one young woman changed her way of eating to enable her to cope with massive health issues, devising a gluten and dairy free plant based diet.  It’s a fascinating read from beginning to end – and the recipes I’ve tried so far work well too.

It occurs to me now that all of my chosen books this month have been recent ones.  Not that there is anything wrong with that.  In fact it’s an indication of just how much good new stuff there is out there. But perhaps next month I’ll try to redress the balance.

 

 

The Words for the Wounded Litfest – Review by Pat Heath

What a brilliant day at Downley Community Centre, 18th April 2015.

This inaugural one-day opportunity for new and established writers, and for readers, did what it said on the packet. We laughed with, learned from, and mingled amongst, experts in the world of writing at the Words for the Wounded (WforW) LitFest. It was organised by the ‘Writing Grannies’ who run the charity.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heath

To open the day, Matt Pain, Trustee, reminded us that the average age of wounded soldiers is 25 years old, which proved thought provoking.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathwelcome

Margaret Graham (‘writing grannie’) and Katie Fforde (WforW patron) opened the day with conversazione. These two bestselling authors covered key aspects of fiction writing, including sub-plots, the need to inhabit your characters and how to deal with a ‘soggy middle’. Something that troubles many of us – writers or not.

A massive amount of invaluable information was delivered with quick fire wit, during this hilarious and valuable session. Meg Cannell presented chocolates to Katie.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathkatiemegmg

After book signing and coffee it was time for some murder and mayhem, with two ‘Midsomer Murders’ TV writers, Rachel Cuperman and Sally Griffiths. Rachel and Sally explained the practical aspects of TV play-writing, punctuated with their own amusing anecdotes.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathrachelsally

Lunch followed, with wine and coffee, organised by Jan Speedie (‘writing grannie’), Margaret’s family and Josh Edwards. It was partially sponsored by Tesco, Morrison’s and Starbucks. A feast, it must be said, and the team did a fantastic job. Seamless.

Many authors choose the Independent Author publishing route and successful ‘Indie’ writers, Amanda Hatter and Catriona Troth, chaired by Penny Deacon, (writing grannie) described how to produce a high-quality self-published book,. This time Penny Deacon (writing grannie) chaired the session as Amanda gave many useful marketing tips, including how to penetrate large chains such as Waterstones, and Catriona explained the advantages of working as part of a writers’ collective, such as Triskele Books.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathcallum The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathtriskele

Felicity Trew, from Caroline Sheldon Literary Agency was introduced by Penny Deacon and gave a power-point presentation in which she explained the role of literary agents: negotiating publishing deals, making sure the contract protects current and future income opportunities, and chasing payments/royalties.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathpdprojector

She also advised on how writers should approach agents, using amusing spoof emails to illustrate her points, and she reminded the audience to check agent’s submission instructions. Her agency’s website has a useful list of ‘pet hates’ including applicants omitting the requested information and obvious ‘carpet bombing’ applications.

Felicity was at the LitFest all day, and was enormously generous with her time.

Finally, Jan Speedie introduced Penny Deacon who talked about why she ‘turned her back on romance and took to murder’. She compared her experiences of writing Mills and Boon to that of crime fiction. This was a relaxed and amusing end to an inspirational, funny, information-packed day.

The Words for the Wounded Litfest  -  Review by Pat Heathjan=pd

Prizes, donated by artist Sharon Bennett, Tesco, (Bollinger champagne) The Wellington, and Katie Fforde were raffled for WforW. Speakers were given boxes of chocolates, partially funded by Thornton’s and delegates were given books donated by Random House. Penny Gerrard made biscuits from heaven and Susan Atkins’ chocolate cake was seriously good.

One clever touch was the notepads and biros on every seat, for invaluable notetaking. Everything was so carefully thought out. It makes a difference.

Next year’s LitFest line up of speakers will include Elizabeth Buchan, bestselling author (patron of WforW) Jemima Hunt, Literary Agent, Catherine Balavage, e-magazine owner (Frost Magazine), and Tracy Baines, successful genre short story writer.

A total of £1,500 was raised by the inaugural LitFest for the rehabilitation of the wounded.

http://www.wordsforthewounded.co.uk