The Pre-Baby List: Things To Do Before You Have Children

gorgeousbabyA pre-baby what? A pre-baby list. Not for women who are pregnant and the dad-to-be, but for people who haven’t had children. Kids might be great but you can’t say they don’t cramp your style. My nephew is now two-years-old and has expanded my brothers life, but also allowed him less freedom. So I am not only compiling a list of things to do in your pre-baby years, but I am also writing a book on it, and I would love you to contribute. Just comment below on the things you think everyone should do before they have children. I have a few of my own below to start things off. I will be adding to the list and also keep you updated on the book. Here goes!

1) Go to Paris on the Eurostar.

2) Go to a music festival.

3) Go to London Fashion Week

4) Go scuba diving.

5) Get your driving license and have a roadtrip around America.

6) Have a roadtrip around Europe.

7) Spend weekends sleeping in late and doing absolutely nothing.

8) Read books

9) Buy the Sunday papers and read them (almost) cover to cover.

10) Learn a new skill

What do you think should be added? Comment below.

Interview with Birth Made Easy Author Paola Bagnall

birth made easyFor our readers who are mothers-to-be we interviewed Paola Bagnall, author of Birth Made Easy. The book review is here. In the meantime enjoy the interview and please comment your thoughts below. Thank you.

I really liked how the book had advice on every aspect of pregnancy and birth. What is the biggest gem you can give to mothers-to-be?

 

To look forward to the birth with excitement and to work with your intuition and trust that your body is designed to give birth, which it is.

 

The book is big on relaxation, is this the most important thing when giving birth? How does one achieve this?

 

Yes relaxation is very important. The late Dr Grantley Dick-Read (1890 – 1959) visited a woman giving birth at her home in Whitechapel in London.  She declined his offer of chloroform, and gave birth without undue problem.  After the delivery, he asked her why she did not want chloroform and she replied, “It didn’t hurt.  It wasn’t meant to, was it?”.  Dr Dick-Reid actually said then that relaxation is the key to a good birth and in his book, Childbirth without Fear, he returned to women their rightful gift of a truly natural birth.

 

Today we are told that giving birth is painful and so many people believe this.  TV programmes like One Born Every Minute also reinforce this.  When you are relaxed you cannot feel fear and this is what hypnobirthing is all about.

 

Relaxation is achieved by visualisation of a favourite place, the use of colours, focusing on the breath and self-hypnosis – all of which are described in the book.  When you are relaxed your body opens up easily and so the baby flows out.

 

What was your own experience of pregnancy and giving birth like?

 

I have two sons and I gave birth to both naturally and relatively easily. The first one took six hours and the second eleven hours.  I am a biologist as well as a hypnotherapist and so I knew that my body could do this and also I was very excited about the process and looking forward to the experience.

 

When I gave birth 39 years ago we were given Pethidine automatically to help with the contractions.  I hated this as it caused me to hallucinate!  I wish I knew then what I know now about self-hypnosis as I would have been much more in control than I was.  Even so both my births were empowering experiences!

 

The book is about giving birth naturally. Do you think a natural birth is better?

 

If you can give birth naturally, I personally feel this is best because it should be a magical, empowering experience, where you are in control.  A natural birth also prevents the side effects of intervention and chemical drugs.

 

When someone has a headache or a medical procedure they generally use painkiller, why not do so when giving birth? It is the only medical thing that some people do without the help of painkillers. How is it different?

 

I’d just like to say that birth is not a medical thing!  It is a natural process and as such is not meant to hurt.  It is the medics in fact who have made it painful.

 

All pain is subjective and different for different people. If you think ‘pain’ then you get ‘pain’.  I feel contractions are different from ‘pain’.  They are intense pressure, good pressure, as they result in the birth of your baby.  I have suffered pain far worse than my contractions.  So think ‘good contractions’ and this alters your mind-set.

 

Of course using painkillers (epidural) may be what some people want and that is OK.

My book does not suggest that you have to have a natural birth.  This is a choice that the mum-to-be must make.  I simply suggest ways to achieve that goal.

 

Do you think the power of the mind can control the body?

 

Most definitely! We have the expression “mind over matter”.  We have the most amazing resource in our unconscious minds that most of us do not tap into.  By using positive affirmations and self-hypnosis we can use this innate ability we all have to make changes in ourselves for the better.

 

I got into hypnotherapy as I had a very painful shoulder injury that the medical profession could not help me with.  I learned to tap into this inner power and heal my shoulder using self-hypnosis. This is what showed me how useful self-hypnosis could be in giving birth. And why I created my own Inner Power Hypnobirthing.

 

Will everyone be able to achieve a natural birth?

 

A natural birth may not happen for everyone, as things just do happen which make it not possible.  If the baby is breach, or with complete placenta previa, where the placenta covers the exit for the baby, or if the baby is distressed in any way, then a C-Section has to be done in the best interests of the mother and baby.  However, hypnobirthing helps you to remain calm and in control in such situations.

 

Do you think you can get back into shape easily after giving birth as long as you work hard?

 

Yes, I do, though this is easier for some people than others.  Part of my hypnobirthing package is to help mums get back to their pre-pregnancy weight, shape and dimensions.  Simple exercises as shown in my book and a sensible diet help to achieve this.

 

Tell us about the self-hypnosis CD.

 

The self-hypnosis CD is to be listened to on a daily basis prior to the birth.  It uses visualisation, colour and positive affirmations to programme the unconscious mind to have a natural childbirth.  It is a bit like putting a program into a computer.  When you hit ‘play’ the program starts.  So the trigger for my CD is the first contraction, or the waters breaking, and then the entire program goes into effect almost automatically.  The CD takes you through pregnancy, the three stages of birth, healing up after the birth, bonding with the baby, breast-feeding easily (if you choose to do this) and getting your figure back.

 

What is the best advice you have for women giving birth?

 

Getting yourself into a positive frame of mind using hypnobirthing and start this as early as you can in your pregnancy so you have a beneficial expectation and you look forward to the birth with joyful anticipation.

Thank you Paola.

Birth Made Easy – The positive and enjoyable way to have a baby easily and naturally using self-hypnosis

 

Idea To iPhone: The Essential Guide To Creating Your First App For iPhone and iPad

Idea To iPhone- The Essential Guide To Creating Your First App For iPhone and iPadApps are big business and the media is full of stories of app millionaires. The internet has made becoming rich easier than ever, or has it? How easy is it to make an app? Or more importantly, how easy is it to sell it?

17-year-old Nick D’Aloisio hit the headlines by selling his app, Summly, to Yahoo for an estimated £18m, making him a tech superstar. But what about the rest of us who are not teenage whiz kids? I reviewed new book, Idea to iPhone to find out. Read on….

Idea to iPhone: The Essential Guide To Creating Your First App For iPhone and iPad by Carla White talks you through building an app from idea to iPhone, iPad, iPad mini or iPod Touch. Chapter 1 kicks off with your app adventure. It lists the excuses you may have not to make an app and dismantles them. I immediately liked this book when I was flicking through it for the first time. It is 294 pages of hard to find knowledge that you would not get anywhere else. Well, maybe if you trawled the internet for days, but even then I am not sure.

The graphs and pictures are great. The book is easy to understand anyway, but they add to the information getting into your brain. I learned that making an app is not as hard as you think and nor is it as expensive.

The other great information in this book is on Apple. How to grab their attention and how to work with them. Carla goes through everything you need to know about working with Apple and how iTunes can help or hurt sales. For instance, did you know that Apple take a 30% cut? They also pay you once a month after a four-week delay. There is also a step-by-step guide on becoming an Apple developer. Each chapter ends with a handy table of key points.

Chapter 2 is Shaping Ideas into Apps People Want. An essential chapter as there is no point in making apps that no one wants. This brilliant chapter lets you know how to find your audience. It also tells you how to integrate your app with Facebook and which device will be right for you.

Another thing I liked about the book is the quotes doted throughout. Perfect for inspiration.

Teaching you about finding an audience and building an app is one thing but marketing is also paramount. This book also covers that. You don’t need to hire an expensive PR company (at least not at first) you just need some hard work and imagination. There is also a checklist on building a press kit and information on how people scan iTunes. Essential for marketing your app.

It also has tips on finding a great designer, or designing yourself. And also a lot of information on finding and working with a developer. Tech tips on Xcode are also incredibly useful.

Further tips on making a profit, keeping track of money and getting the press interested make this book essential for anyone who wants to create their own app and become successful.

Idea to IPhone: The Essential Guide to Creating Your First App for the IPhone and IPad

 

Vichy Idealia Smoothing and Illuminating Cream Review

vichy idealia reviewIt is not common for me to be upset when a moisturiser runs out. There is always something else to try. But when my Vichy Idealia Smoothing and Illuminating Cream ran out I felt forlorn. It is just that good.

It smells delicious, which is probably the Kombucha tea extract, the packaging is stylish and the texture of the pink cream is light and not too heavy, but, importantly, it really works. I used this religiously twice a day, except for once or twice when I went to bed late. When I did not use it I could see the difference in my skin. I just looked less fresh, less ‘illuminated’. The overall tone of my skin is greatly improved. It evens skin tone and smooths out wrinkles.

I have sensitive skin and this hypoallergenic cream was gentle with it. It did not irritate it at all. It is also paraben-free. I really love this moisturiser and so did my skin.

Vichy say,

– Enriched with Kombucha 3%, AHAs, Vitamins, Probiotics and Polyphenols
– Skin feels more even, smoother, supple and refined
– The complexion is more radiant
– Skin is replumped with moisture
– Skin looks more youthful, fresher and healthier

The ingredients

vichy ingredients

It is quite pricey at £22 but I think it is definitely worth the money and a little goes a long way. It is like youth in a pot.

Available from Superdrug or Selfridges.

 

Star Trek Into Darkness {Film Review}

WARNING! Unlike most of my past reviews I have written, there will be spoilers in order to fully explain my thoughts on the film. So if you have not yet seen the film, I suggest you go out and do so (unless you REALLY want to know).

 

Amongst the many sequels 2013 provides; we now have Star Trek Into Darkness, sequel to J.J. Abrams’ 2009 Star Trek. The first film was fun but also stayed faithful to the spirit that Gene Roddenberry created back in 1966. Not only did it please the core fan-base but also encouraged to bring new fans to the series. Rather being a straight prequel to the Original Series, they’ve cleverly decided to create a scenario that involves the villain coming from the future and alternating the timeline. Therefore making it rather unpredictable whether Kirk and his crew will come across old characters and having the same outcome.

The film begins in the middle of a mission on a planet inhabited by a tribe and Kirk (Chris Pine) and co. are there to stop a volcano erupting. Though Spock’s (Zachary Quinto) life is in jeopardy and Kirk violates the Prime Directive to save his life. Meanwhile, London gets attacked when a bomb goes off (quite daring seeing the film is released after the tragic Boston Marathon bombings in April) and the prime suspect is former Starfleet agent John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch). Kirk’s mission is to find Harrison and bring him to justice. Though the crew later find out they’re in much deeper water they anticipated and reveals there’s a lot more to Harrison than what we just see.

The entire cast of the Enterprise crew are back and are just as you expect them to be. It really does continue to Star Trek tradition of camaraderie, the sense of relying on each to get the job done and acts like they’re a family. Though the bromance between Kirk and Spock causes some genuine amusement, especially Kirk having to deal with Spock’s vulcan personality. Zoë Saldana continues to make Uhura a strong character, being conflicted on dealing with Spock’s inability to feel. Alice Eve plays Dr. Carol Marcus, a science officer who boards the Enterprise upon learning about Kirk’s mission. The character was featured in The Wrath of Khan, which only sets up for one conclusion to be Kirk’s love interest. That particular purpose is mainly the problem, she really doesn’t do a lot apart from being partially naked. The rest of the crew provides support and comedy relief through-out the film. Though nothing seems to have been progressed since the first film; Kirk is still having issues on living up to his father and being responsible for his actions. Spock is apparently still learning on being human, thus making the scene where he beats Kirk to a pulp when Kirk mentions about his mother pointless because we have to see him go through feeling angry again.

star_trek_into_darkness_ver21_xlg

The biggest addition is Benedict Cumberbatch, who is actually revealed to be Khan (as in Khan Noonien Singh, played previously by Ricardo Montalbán in an episode of Star Trek: The Original Series and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan). Khan’s story-line is very similar that was established in previous incarnations, a superhuman from the Eugenics War has been awakened from being cryogenically frozen 300 years ago. Though this character reveal has been the worst kept secret I can remember, as it had been rumoured Khan would eventually turn up (even IMDb listed Cumberbatch to be rumoured as Khan). Unlike previous worst kept secret character reveals (one recent secret pops into my mind is Naomie Harris as Miss Moneypenny in Skyfall), this character reveal twist doesn’t really serve any purpose than just for fan service. Cumberbatch really does make the character intimidating (more than Eric Bana’s Nero in the first film) but it’s just a waste of talent when he’s playing a character that adds nothing to the movie apart from being the latest addition of bad guy in a trench coat. This is incredibly disappointing from J.J. Abrams and screenwriter’s direction with this sequel, as they could’ve easily created something new rather than rehash scenes from previous movies (huge example being Kirk’s and Spock’s places have been switched from Wrath of Khan; Kirk sacrifices himself to fix the ship and Spock gets to shout “KHAN!!!” for no reason than the filmmakers to say “hey, it happened in the previous movie!”) The whole movie left very few surprises as we’re just going through what we’ve already seen before and done better in other movies (i.e. having the villain surrender himself, get locked up and somehow use this tactic to his advantage like The Dark Knight, Marvel’s The Avengers and Skyfall). Though one would argue being an alternative timeline, events and actions still could happen in the same way but switching characters or situations.

The spectacle in this film is top notch, the visual effects provided by ILM continues to provide stellar action sequences. They all create this sense of awe when the Enterprise come across strange worlds in different galaxies. The final climactic fight between Spock and Khan is fun to watch but isn’t breathtaking as you would expect a final showdown. Michael Giacchino’s score is excellent, even if not too subtle for some parts (Khan’s introduction needs no explanation). The production design all makes the layout of the Enterprise seem vast and plausible on how it all works. However, J.J. Abrams’ trademark lens flare returns and this is where it will divide audiences. For the most part, it gives Abrams’ films a sense of filmmaking identity (we’re already suspecting Star Wars Episode VII to contain his signature lens flares) but they do distract you from concentrating on what’s happening in the film. Not a major flaw but depends how you feel about the idea of lens flares occurring through-out the entire 133 minutes.

Overall; a slight disappointment of a sequel, though the cast make it all sell and the production value is excellent. Despite certain plot and character twists that didn’t serve any purpose, I had a rollicking good time and that’s better than nothing.

3 out of 5

 

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ec_rPApKCA&w=560&h=315]

Deadfall Film Review

Deadfall film review*Spoiler Alert*

One of the best things about Deadfall is Eric Bana. His turn as Addison, a man on the run with his sister (Olivia Wilde) after a botched casino heist is outstanding: chilling and ruthless. He plays psychopath incredibly well. The wintry landscape and the pace of the film makes this a wonderfully entertaining thriller/western/noir.

However his stone-cold killer has a different side. Whilst on the run he sees a man abusing his wife and children, throwing them out into the snow, he helps the family but in the morning gets into a shoot out with the police. The small daughter, who thought he was there to save them, says ‘You’re no angel!’. “No, I’m not.’ he says and makes a run for it.

Addison is clearly loved by his sister Liza, but unlike him she actually has a conscious and morals. They separate as the police are looking for a man and a woman. Olivia Wilde is great as Liza but must have been freezing in her skimpy clothes. All of the characters are multi-layered and crash into each other before coming together in a tension filled finale.

Sissy Spacek is always brilliant, and here she is calm and collected as the woman who has unwelcome thanksgiving guests.

There is also an excellent snowmobile chase and the film starts with a well-shot car crash. An excellent crime drama. Go see.

The Big Wedding | Film review

MV5BMTcwODUwMjg2Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTc2NzkxOA@@._V1_SX214_*Spoiler Alert*

This broad comedy about a long divorced couple (Robert De Niro and Diane Keaton) who pretend they are still married for their adopted son (Ben Barnes) is fun and entertaining. His biological mother is a strict catholic and he never told her they divorced.

De Niro’s character, who cheated on his ex-wife and has been through AA three times, is a lovable rogue. His long term girlfriend (Susan Sarandon who is amazing) was the best friend of his ex-wife. The only thing I disliked about the film, and which I found unrealistic, is that Keaton and Sarandon would be friends, and that Sarandon also lives in the house that the couple built themselves and raised their children in with her ex-husband. I can’t think of one woman who would be friends with the woman who broke up her family and now lives in the family home.

This is big comedy, and it is not scared to take risks. Some of the comedy is risque, but I really enjoyed it. It has a strong cast who bounce of each other well. Robin Williams as the priest is as good as ever.  De Niro (my favourite actor) plays his character well, making a complex and flawed character lovable.

This is a Hollywood comedy film, the person I watched the film with said it was funny and good, but not realistic. In a way I agree, but I don’t care. This film would make a great night out: funny and entertaining.

 

7 in 10 women would do same as Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie has breasts removed. Almost seven out of every ten women say they would undergo a preventive double mastectomy if tests indicated they were at a high risk of breast cancer 

A new YouGov poll finds that nearly seven in 10 women in Britain would have a double mastectomy if genetic tests suggested they had a very high chance of developing breast cancer.

On Tuesday, Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie announced in a widely reported editorial for the New York Times titled “My Medical Choice” that she had undergone a double mastectomy as a preventive measure against breast cancer. Jolie said that doctors estimated that she “had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer” due to a “faulty” gene, BRCA1, which increases cancer risk.

68% of women say they would have all natural breast tissue removed and replaced with implants if genetic tests suggested a very high probability of developing breast cancer.

The YouGov survey also found that in identical proportions British women and men would undergo preventive surgery if tests suggested they were at a very high risk of a particular cancer. 70% of Britons say they would in principle undergo surgery to prevent the development of a cancer if tests suggested there was a very high chance of it developing, including 70% of men and 70% of women.

Asked if they would have genetic tests to screen for susceptibility towards particular types of cancer, and 64% of British adults say they would, including 62% of women and 66% of men.

One in five (21%) worry that there is a type of cancer they are particularly susceptible to because of family medical history.